BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Seth Gilbert

Seth Gilbert contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingCryptography and SecurityNetworking and Internet Architecture

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
12works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

OverChain: Building a robust overlay with a blockchain

Blockchains use peer-to-peer networks for disseminating information among peers, but these networks currently do not have any provable guarantees for desirable properties such as Byzantine fault tolerance, good connectivity and small diameter. This is not just a theoretical problem, as recent works have exploited unsafe peer connection policies and weak network synchronization to mount partitioning attacks on Bitcoin. Cryptocurrency blockchains are safety critical systems, so we need principled algorithms to maintain their networks. Our key insight is that we can leverage the blockchain itself to share information among the peers, and thus simplify the network maintenance process. Given that the peers have restricted computational resources, and at most a constant fraction of them are Byzantine, we provide communication-efficient protocols to maintain a hypercubic network for blockchains, where peers can join and leave over time. Interestingly, we discover that our design can \emph{recover} from substantial adversarial failures. Moreover, these properties hold despite significant churn. A key contribution is a secure mechanism for joining the network that uses the blockchain to help new peers to contact existing peers. Furthermore, by examining how peers join the network, i.e., the "bootstrapping service," we give a lower bound showing that (within log factors) our network tolerates the maximum churn rate possible. In fact, we can give a lower bound on churn for any fully distributed service that requires connectivity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Smoothed Analysis of Information Spreading in Dynamic Networks

The best known solutions for $k$-message broadcast in dynamic networks of size $n$ require $Ω(nk)$ rounds. In this paper, we see if these bounds can be improved by smoothed analysis. We study perhaps the most natural randomized algorithm for disseminating tokens in this setting: at every time step, choose a token to broadcast randomly from the set of tokens you know. We show that with even a small amount of smoothing (one random edge added per round), this natural strategy solves $k$-message broadcast in $\tilde{O}(n+k^3)$ rounds, with high probability, beating the best known bounds for $k=o(\sqrt{n})$ and matching the $Ω(n+k)$ lower bound for static networks for $k=O(n^{1/3})$ (ignoring logarithmic factors). In fact, the main result we show is even stronger and more general: given $\ell$-smoothing (i.e., $\ell$ random edges added per round), this simple strategy terminates in $O(kn^{2/3}\log^{1/3}(n)\ell^{-1/3})$ rounds. We then prove this analysis close to tight with an almost-matching lower bound. To better understand the impact of smoothing on information spreading, we next turn our attention to static networks, proving a tight bound of $\tilde{O}(k\sqrt{n})$ rounds to solve $k$-message broadcast, which is better than what our strategy can achieve in the dynamic setting. This confirms that although smoothed analysis reduces the difficulties induced by changing graph structures, it does not eliminate them altogether. Finally, we apply our tools to prove an optimal result for $k$-message broadcast in so-called well-mixed networks in the absence of smoothing. By comparing this result to an existing lower bound for well-mixed networks, we establish a formal separation between oblivious and strongly adaptive adversaries with respect to well-mixed token spreading, partially resolving an open question on the impact of adversary strength on the $k$-message broadcast problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

How fast can you update your MST? (Dynamic algorithms for cluster computing)

Imagine a large graph that is being processed by a cluster of computers, e.g., described by the $k$-machine model or the Massively Parallel Computation Model. The graph, however, is not static; instead it is receiving a constant stream of updates. How fast can the cluster process the stream of updates? The fundamental question we want to ask in this paper is whether we can update the graph fast enough to keep up with the stream. We focus specifically on the problem of maintaining a minimum spanning tree (MST), and we give an algorithm for the $k$-machine model that can process $O(k)$ graph updates per $O(1)$ rounds with high probability. (And these results carry over to the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model.) We also show a lower bound, i.e., it is impossible to process $k^{1+ε}$ updates in $O(1)$ rounds. Thus we provide a nearly tight answer to the question of how fast a cluster can respond to a stream of graph modifications while maintaining an MST.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Latency, Capacity, and Distributed MST

We study the cost of distributed MST construction in the setting where each edge has a latency and a capacity, along with the weight. Edge latencies capture the delay on the links of the communication network, while capacity captures their throughput (in this case, the rate at which messages can be sent). Depending on how the edge latencies relate to the edge weights, we provide several tight bounds on the time and messages required to construct an MST. When edge weights exactly correspond with the latencies, we show that, perhaps interestingly, the bottleneck parameter in determining the running time of an algorithm is the total weight $W$ of the MST (rather than the total number of nodes $n$, as in the standard CONGEST model). That is, we show a tight bound of $\tildeΘ(D + \sqrt{W/c})$ rounds, where $D$ refers to the latency diameter of the graph, $W$ refers to the total weight of the constructed MST and edges have capacity $c$. The proposed algorithm sends $\tilde{O}(m+W)$ messages, where $m$, the total number of edges in the network graph under consideration, is a known lower bound on message complexity for MST construction. We also show that $Ω(W)$ is a lower bound for fast MST constructions. When the edge latencies and the corresponding edge weights are unrelated, and either can take arbitrary values, we show that (unlike the sub-linear time algorithms in the standard CONGEST model, on small diameter graphs), the best time complexity that can be achieved is $\tildeΘ(D+n/c)$. However, if we restrict all edges to have equal latency $\ell$ and capacity $c$ while having possibly different weights (weights could deviate arbitrarily from $\ell$), we give an algorithm that constructs an MST in $\tilde{O}(D + \sqrt{n\ell/c})$ time. In each case, we provide nearly matching upper and lower bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Dynamic Reallocation Problems in Scheduling

In this paper we look at the problem of scheduling tasks on a single-processor system, where each task requires unit time and must be scheduled within a certain time window, and each task can be added to or removed from the system at any time. On each operation, the system is allowed to reschedule any tasks, but the goal is to minimize the number of rescheduled tasks. Our main result is an allocator that maintains a valid schedule for all tasks in the system if their time windows have constant size and reschedules O(1/ε*log(1/ε)) tasks on each insertion as ε->0, where ε is a certain measure of the schedule flexibility of the system. We also show that it is optimal for any allocator that works on arbitrary instances. We also briefly mention a few variants of the problem, such as if the tasks have time windows of difference sizes, for which we have an allocator that we conjecture reschedules only 1 task on each insertion if the schedule flexibility remains above a certain threshold.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

How to Scale Exponential Backoff

Randomized exponential backoff is a widely deployed technique for coordinating access to a shared resource. A good backoff protocol should, arguably, satisfy three natural properties: (i) it should provide constant throughput, wasting as little time as possible; (ii) it should require few failed access attempts, minimizing the amount of wasted effort; and (iii) it should be robust, continuing to work efficiently even if some of the access attempts fail for spurious reasons. Unfortunately, exponential backoff has some well-known limitations in two of these areas: it provides poor (sub-constant) throughput (in the worst case), and is not robust (to resource acquisition failures). The goal of this paper is to "fix" exponential backoff by making it scalable, particularly focusing on the case where processes arrive in an on-line, worst-case fashion. We present a relatively simple backoff protocol~Re-Backoff~that has, at its heart, a version of exponential backoff. It guarantees expected constant throughput with dynamic process arrivals and requires only an expected polylogarithmic number of access attempts per process. Re-Backoff is also robust to periods where the shared resource is unavailable for a period of time. If it is unavailable for $D$ time slots, Re-Backoff provides the following guarantees. When the number of packets is a finite $n$, the average expected number of access attempts for successfully sending a packet is $O(\log^2( n + D))$. In the infinite case, the average expected number of access attempts for successfully sending a packet is $O( \log^2(η) + \log^2(D) )$ where $η$ is the maximum number of processes that are ever in the system concurrently.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On Differentially Private Online Collaborative Recommendation Systems

In collaborative recommendation systems, privacy may be compromised, as users' opinions are used to generate recommendations for others. In this paper, we consider an online collaborative recommendation system, and we measure users' privacy in terms of the standard differential privacy. We give the first quantitative analysis of the trade-offs between recommendation quality and users' privacy in such a system by showing a lower bound on the best achievable privacy for any non-trivial algorithm, and proposing a near-optimal algorithm. From our results, we find that there is actually little trade-off between recommendation quality and privacy for any non-trivial algorithm. Our results also identify the key parameters that determine the best achievable privacy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Smoothed Analysis of Dynamic Networks

We generalize the technique of smoothed analysis to distributed algorithms in dynamic network models. Whereas standard smoothed analysis studies the impact of small random perturbations of input values on algorithm performance metrics, dynamic graph smoothed analysis studies the impact of random perturbations of the underlying changing network graph topologies. Similar to the original application of smoothed analysis, our goal is to study whether known strong lower bounds in dynamic network models are robust or fragile: do they withstand small (random) perturbations, or do such deviations push the graphs far enough from a precise pathological instance to enable much better performance? Fragile lower bounds are likely not relevant for real-world deployment, while robust lower bounds represent a true difficulty caused by dynamic behavior. We apply this technique to three standard dynamic network problems with known strong worst-case lower bounds: random walks, flooding, and aggregation. We prove that these bounds provide a spectrum of robustness when subjected to smoothing---some are extremely fragile (random walks), some are moderately fragile / robust (flooding), and some are extremely robust (aggregation).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The Computational Power of Beeps

In this paper, we study the quantity of computational resources (state machine states and/or probabilistic transition precision) needed to solve specific problems in a single hop network where nodes communicate using only beeps. We begin by focusing on randomized leader election. We prove a lower bound on the states required to solve this problem with a given error bound, probability precision, and (when relevant) network size lower bound. We then show the bound tight with a matching upper bound. Noting that our optimal upper bound is slow, we describe two faster algorithms that trade some state optimality to gain efficiency. We then turn our attention to more general classes of problems by proving that once you have enough states to solve leader election with a given error bound, you have (within constant factors) enough states to simulate correctly, with this same error bound, a logspace TM with a constant number of unary input tapes: allowing you to solve a large and expressive set of problems. These results identify a key simplicity threshold beyond which useful distributed computation is possible in the beeping model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Reallocation Problems in Scheduling

In traditional on-line problems, such as scheduling, requests arrive over time, demanding available resources. As each request arrives, some resources may have to be irrevocably committed to servicing that request. In many situations, however, it may be possible or even necessary to reallocate previously allocated resources in order to satisfy a new request. This reallocation has a cost. This paper shows how to service the requests while minimizing the reallocation cost. We focus on the classic problem of scheduling jobs on a multiprocessor system. Each unit-size job has a time window in which it can be executed. Jobs are dynamically added and removed from the system. We provide an algorithm that maintains a valid schedule, as long as a sufficiently feasible schedule exists. The algorithm reschedules only a total number of O(min{log^* n, log^* Delta}) jobs for each job that is inserted or deleted from the system, where n is the number of active jobs and Delta is the size of the largest window.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Making Evildoers Pay: Resource-Competitive Broadcast in Sensor Networks

Consider a time-slotted, single-hop, wireless sensor network (WSN) consisting of n correct devices and and t=f*n Byzantine devices where f>=0 is any constant; that is, the Byzantine devices may outnumber the correct ones. There exists a trusted sender Alice who wishes to deliver a message m over a single channel to the correct devices. There also exists a malicious user Carol who controls the t Byzantine devices and uses them to disrupt the communication channel. For a constant k>=2, the correct and Byzantine devices each possess a meager energy budget of O(n^{1/k}), Alice and Carol each possess a limited budget of \tilde{O}(n^{1/k}), and sending or listening in a slot incurs unit cost. This general setup captures the inherent challenges of guaranteeing communication despite scarce resources and attacks on the network. Given this Alice versus Carol scenario, we ask: Is communication of m feasible and, if so, at what cost? We develop a protocol which, for an arbitrarily small constant ε>0, ensures that at least (1-ε)n correct devices receive m with high probability. Furthermore, if Carol's devices expend T energy jamming the channel, then Alice and the correct devices each spend only \tilde{O}(T^{1/(k+1)}). In other words, delaying the transmission of m forces a jammer to rapidly deplete its energy supply and, consequently, cease attacks on the network.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A New Approach to Incremental Cycle Detection and Related Problems

We consider the problem of detecting a cycle in a directed graph that grows by arc insertions, and the related problems of maintaining a topological order and the strong components of such a graph. For these problems, we give two algorithms, one suited to sparse graphs, and the other to dense graphs. The former takes the minimum of O(m^{3/2}) and O(mn^{2/3}) time to insert m arcs into an n-vertex graph; the latter takes O(n^2 log(n)) time. Our sparse algorithm is considerably simpler than a previous O(m^{3/2})-time algorithm; it is also faster on graphs of sufficient density. The time bound of our dense algorithm beats the previously best time bound of O(n^{5/2}) for dense graphs. Our algorithms rely for their efficiency on topologically ordered vertex numberings; bounds on the size of the numbers give bound on running times.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access