BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Sergey Matskevich

Sergey Matskevich appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computation and LanguageMachine LearningProgramming LanguagesSoftware Engineering

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Natural Language Specifications in Proof Assistants

Interactive proof assistants are computer programs carefully constructed to check a human-designed proof of a mathematical claim with high confidence in the implementation. However, this only validates truth of a formal claim, which may have been mistranslated from a claim made in natural language. This is especially problematic when using proof assistants to formally verify the correctness of software with respect to a natural language specification. The translation from informal to formal remains a challenging, time-consuming process that is difficult to audit for correctness. This paper argues that it is possible to build support for natural language specifications within existing proof assistants, in a way that complements the principles used to establish trust and auditability in proof assistants themselves.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Preprocessing Source Code Comments for Linguistic Models

Comments are an important part of the source code and are a primary source of documentation. This has driven interest in using large bodies of comments to train or evaluate tools that consume or produce them -- such as generating oracles or even code from comments, or automatically generating code summaries. Most of this work makes strong assumptions about the structure and quality of comments, such as assuming they consist mostly of proper English sentences. However, we know little about the actual quality of existing comments for these use cases. Comments often contain unique structures and elements that are not seen in other types of text, and filtering or extracting information from them requires some extra care. This paper explores the contents and quality of Python comments drawn from 840 most popular open source projects from GitHub and 8422 projects from SriLab dataset, and the impact of naïve vs. in-depth filtering can have on the use of existing comments for training and evaluation of systems that generate comments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access