Source author record

Seda Davtyan

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

1topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2014arXiv

Technical Report: Dealing with Undependable Workers in Decentralized Network Supercomputing

Internet supercomputing is an approach to solving partitionable, computation-intensive problems by harnessing the power of a vast number of interconnected computers. This paper presents a new algorithm for the problem of using network supercomputing to perform a large collection of independent tasks, while dealing with undependable processors. The adversary may cause the processors to return bogus results for tasks with certain probabilities, and may cause a subset $F$ of the initial set of processors $P$ to crash. The adversary is constrained in two ways. First, for the set of non-crashed processors $P-F$ , the \emph{average} probability of a processor returning a bogus result is inferior to $\frac{1}{2}$ . Second, the adversary may crash a subset of processors $F$ , provided the size of $P-F$ is bounded from below. We consider two models: the first bounds the size of $P-F$ by a fractional polynomial, the second bounds this size by a poly-logarithm. Both models yield adversaries that are much stronger than previously studied. Our randomized synchronous algorithm is formulated for $n$ processors and $t$ tasks, with $n\le t$ , where depending on the number of crashes each live processor is able to terminate dynamically with the knowledge that the problem is solved with high probability. For the adversary constrained by a fractional polynomial, the round complexity of the algorithm is $O(\frac{t}{n^\varepsilon}\log{n}\log{\log{n}})$ , its work is $O(t\log{n} \log{\log{n}})$ and message complexity is $O(n\log{n}\log{\log{n}})$ . For the poly-log constrained adversary, the round complexity is $O(t)$ , work is $O(t n^{\varepsilon})$ , % $O(t \, poly \log{n})$ , and message complexity is $O(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ % $O(n \, poly \log{n})$ . All bounds are shown to hold with high probability.

preprint2014arXiv

Technical Report: Estimating Reliability of Workers for Cooperative Distributed Computing

Internet supercomputing is an approach to solving partitionable, computation-intensive problems by harnessing the power of a vast number of interconnected computers. For the problem of using network supercomputing to perform a large collection of independent tasks, prior work introduced a decentralized approach and provided randomized synchronous algorithms that perform all tasks correctly with high probability, while dealing with misbehaving or crash-prone processors. The main weaknesses of existing algorithms is that they assume either that the \emph{average} probability of a non-crashed processor returning incorrect results is inferior to $\frac{1}{2}$ , or that the probability of returning incorrect results is known to \emph{each} processor. Here we present a randomized synchronous distributed algorithm that tightly estimates the probability of each processor returning correct results. Starting with the set $P$ of $n$ processors, let $F$ be the set of processors that crash. Our algorithm estimates the probability $p_i$ of returning a correct result for each processor $i \in P-F$ , making the estimates available to all these processors. The estimation is based on the $(ε, δ)$ -approximation, where each estimated probability $\tilde{p_i}$ of $p_i$ obeys the bound ${\sf Pr}[p_i(1-ε) \leq \tilde{p_i} \leq p_i(1+ε)] > 1 - δ$ , for any constants $δ>0$ and $ε>0$ chosen by the user. An important aspect of this algorithm is that each processor terminates without global coordination. We assess the efficiency of the algorithm in three adversarial models as follows. For the model where the number of non-crashed processors $|P-F|$ is linearly bounded the time complexity $T(n)$ of the algorithm is $Θ(\log{n})$ , work complexity $W(n)$ is $Θ(n\log{n})$ , and message complexity $M(n)$ is $Θ(n\log^2n)$ .

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.