BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sebastian Ruland

Sebastian Ruland contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the Interaction between Test-Suite Reduction and Regression-Test Selection Strategies

Unit testing is one of the most established quality-assurance techniques for software development. One major advantage of unit testing is the adjustable trade-off between efficiency (i.e., testing effort) and effectiveness (i.e., fault-detection probability). To this end, various strategies have been proposed to exploit this trade-off. In particular, test-suite reduction (TSR) reduces the number of (presumably redundant) test cases while testing a single program version. Regression-test selection (RTS) selects test cases for testing consecutive program revisions. However, both TSR and RTS may influence -- or even obstruct -- each others' performance when used in combination. For instance, test cases discarded during TSR for a particular program version may become relevant again for RTS. However, finding a combination of both strategies leading to a reasonable trade-off throughout the version history of a program is an open question. The goal of this paper is to gain a better understanding of the interactions between TSR and RTS with respect to efficiency and effectiveness. To this end, we present a configurable framework called RegreTS for automated unit-testing of C programs. The framework comprises different strategies for TSR and RTS and possible combinations thereof. We apply this framework to a collection of subject systems, delivering several crucial insights. First, TSR has almost always a negative impact on the effectiveness of RTS, yet a positive impact on efficiency. Second, test cases revealing to testers the effect of program modifications between consecutive program versions are far more effective than test cases simply covering modified code parts, yet causing much more testing effort.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

T-Wise Presence Condition Coverage and Sampling for Configurable Systems

Sampling techniques, such as t-wise interaction sampling are used to enable efficient testing for configurable systems. This is achieved by generating a small yet representative sample of configurations for a system, which circumvents testing the entire solution space. However, by design, most recent approaches for t-wise interaction sampling only consider combinations of configuration options from a configurable system's variability model and do not take into account their mapping onto the solution space, thus potentially leaving critical implementation artifacts untested. Tartler et al. address this problem by considering presence conditions of implementation artifacts rather than pure configuration options, but do not consider the possible interactions between these artifacts. In this paper, we introduce t-wise presence condition coverage, which extends the approach of Tartler et al. by using presence conditions extracted from the code as basis to cover t-wise interactions. This ensures that all t-wise interactions of implementation artifacts are included in the sample and that the chance of detecting combinations of faulty configuration options is increased. We evaluate our approach in terms of testing efficiency and testing effectiveness by comparing the approach to existing t-wise interaction sampling techniques. We show that t-wise presence condition sampling is able to produce mostly smaller samples compared to t-wise interaction sampling, while guaranteeing a t-wise presence condition coverage of 100%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access