BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Malte Lochau

Malte Lochau contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software EngineeringLogic in Computer ScienceFormal Languages and Automata Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the Interaction between Test-Suite Reduction and Regression-Test Selection Strategies

Unit testing is one of the most established quality-assurance techniques for software development. One major advantage of unit testing is the adjustable trade-off between efficiency (i.e., testing effort) and effectiveness (i.e., fault-detection probability). To this end, various strategies have been proposed to exploit this trade-off. In particular, test-suite reduction (TSR) reduces the number of (presumably redundant) test cases while testing a single program version. Regression-test selection (RTS) selects test cases for testing consecutive program revisions. However, both TSR and RTS may influence -- or even obstruct -- each others' performance when used in combination. For instance, test cases discarded during TSR for a particular program version may become relevant again for RTS. However, finding a combination of both strategies leading to a reasonable trade-off throughout the version history of a program is an open question. The goal of this paper is to gain a better understanding of the interactions between TSR and RTS with respect to efficiency and effectiveness. To this end, we present a configurable framework called RegreTS for automated unit-testing of C programs. The framework comprises different strategies for TSR and RTS and possible combinations thereof. We apply this framework to a collection of subject systems, delivering several crucial insights. First, TSR has almost always a negative impact on the effectiveness of RTS, yet a positive impact on efficiency. Second, test cases revealing to testers the effect of program modifications between consecutive program versions are far more effective than test cases simply covering modified code parts, yet causing much more testing effort.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

T-Wise Presence Condition Coverage and Sampling for Configurable Systems

Sampling techniques, such as t-wise interaction sampling are used to enable efficient testing for configurable systems. This is achieved by generating a small yet representative sample of configurations for a system, which circumvents testing the entire solution space. However, by design, most recent approaches for t-wise interaction sampling only consider combinations of configuration options from a configurable system's variability model and do not take into account their mapping onto the solution space, thus potentially leaving critical implementation artifacts untested. Tartler et al. address this problem by considering presence conditions of implementation artifacts rather than pure configuration options, but do not consider the possible interactions between these artifacts. In this paper, we introduce t-wise presence condition coverage, which extends the approach of Tartler et al. by using presence conditions extracted from the code as basis to cover t-wise interactions. This ensures that all t-wise interactions of implementation artifacts are included in the sample and that the chance of detecting combinations of faulty configuration options is increased. We evaluate our approach in terms of testing efficiency and testing effectiveness by comparing the approach to existing t-wise interaction sampling techniques. We show that t-wise presence condition sampling is able to produce mostly smaller samples compared to t-wise interaction sampling, while guaranteeing a t-wise presence condition coverage of 100%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Checking Timed Bisimulation with Bounded Zone-History Graphs -- Technical Report

Timed automata (TA) are a well-established formalism for specifying discrete-state/continuous-time behavior of time-critical reactive systems. Concerning the fundamental analysis problem of comparing a candidate implementation against a specification, both given as TA, it has been shown that timed trace equivalence is undecidable, whereas timed bisimulation equivalence is decidable. The corresponding proof utilizes region graphs, a finite, but generally very space-consuming characterization of TA semantics. Hence, most practical TA tools utilize zone graphs instead, a symbolic and generally more efficient representation of TA semantics, to automate analysis tasks. However, zone graphs only produce sound results for analysis tasks being reducible to plain reachability problems thus being too imprecise for checking timed bisimilarity. In this paper, we propose bounded zone-history graphs, a novel characterization of TA semantics facilitating an adjustable trade-off between precision and scalability of timed-bisimilarity checking. Our tool TimBrCheck is, to the best of our knowledge, the only currently available tool for effectively checking timed bisimilarity and even supports non-deterministic TA with silent moves. We further present experimental results gained from applying our tool to a collection of community benchmarks, providing insights into trade-offs between precision and efficiency, depending on the bound value.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Compositional Liveness-Preserving Conformance Testing of Timed I/O Automata -- Technical Report

I/O conformance testing theories (e.g., ioco) are concerned with formally defining when observable output behaviors of an implementation conform to those permitted by a specification. Thereupon, several real-time extensions of ioco, usually called tioco, have been proposed, further taking into account permitted delays between actions. In this paper, we propose an improved version of tioco, called live timed ioco (ltioco), tackling various weaknesses of existing definitions. Here, a reasonable adaptation of quiescence (i.e., observable absence of any outputs) to real-time behaviors has to be done with care: ltioco therefore distinguishes safe outputs being allowed to happen, from live outputs being enforced to happen within a certain time period thus inducing two different facets of quiescence. Furthermore, tioco is frequently defined on Timed I/O Labeled Transition Systems (TIOLTS), a semantic model of Timed I/O Automata (TIOA) which is infinitely branching and thus infeasible for practical testing tools. Instead, we extend the theory of zone graphs to enable ltioco testing on a finite semantic model of TIOA. Finally, we investigate compositionality of ltioco with respect to parallel composition including a proper treatment of silent transitions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Conflict Detection for Edits on Extended Feature Models using Symbolic Graph Transformation

Feature models are used to specify variability of user-configurable systems as appearing, e.g., in software product lines. Software product lines are supposed to be long-living and, therefore, have to continuously evolve over time to meet ever-changing requirements. Evolution imposes changes to feature models in terms of edit operations. Ensuring consistency of concurrent edits requires appropriate conflict detection techniques. However, recent approaches fail to handle crucial subtleties of extended feature models, namely constraints mixing feature-tree patterns with first-order logic formulas over non-Boolean feature attributes with potentially infinite value domains. In this paper, we propose a novel conflict detection approach based on symbolic graph transformation to facilitate concurrent edits on extended feature models. We describe extended feature models formally with symbolic graphs and edit operations with symbolic graph transformation rules combining graph patterns with first-order logic formulas. The approach is implemented by combining eMoflon with an SMT solver, and evaluated with respect to applicability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Improved Conflict Detection for Graph Transformation with Attributes

In graph transformation, a conflict describes a situation where two alternative transformations cannot be arbitrarily serialized. When enriching graphs with attributes, existing conflict detection techniques typically report a conflict whenever at least one of two transformations manipulates a shared attribute. In this paper, we propose an improved, less conservative condition for static conflict detection of graph transformation with attributes by explicitly taking the semantics of the attribute operations into account. The proposed technique is based on symbolic graphs, which extend the traditional notion of graphs by logic formulas used for attribute handling. The approach is proven complete, i.e., any potential conflict is guaranteed to be detected.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Towards an I/O Conformance Testing Theory for Software Product Lines based on Modal Interface Automata

We present an adaptation of input/output conformance (ioco) testing principles to families of similar implementation variants as appearing in product line engineering. Our proposed product line testing theory relies on Modal Interface Automata (MIA) as behavioral specification formalism. MIA enrich I/O-labeled transition systems with may/must modalities to distinguish mandatory from optional behavior, thus providing a semantic notion of intrinsic behavioral variability. In particular, MIA constitute a restricted, yet fully expressive subclass of I/O-labeled modal transition systems, guaranteeing desirable refinement and compositionality properties. The resulting modal-ioco relation defined on MIA is preserved under MIA refinement, which serves as variant derivation mechanism in our product line testing theory. As a result, modal-ioco is proven correct in the sense that it coincides with traditional ioco to hold for every derivable implementation variant. Based on this result, a family-based product line conformance testing framework can be established.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access