BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Scott M. Summers

Scott M. Summers contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityComputational GeometryData Structures and AlgorithmsEmerging Technologies

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
14works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Improved lower and upper bounds on the tile complexity of uniquely self-assembling a thin rectangle non-cooperatively in 3D

We investigate a fundamental question regarding a benchmark class of shapes in one of the simplest, yet most widely utilized abstract models of algorithmic tile self-assembly. Specifically, we study the directed tile complexity of a $k \times N$ thin rectangle in Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model, assuming that cooperative binding cannot be enforced (temperature-1 self-assembly) and that tiles are allowed to be placed at most one step into the third dimension (just-barely 3D). While the directed tile complexities of a square and a scaled-up version of any algorithmically specified shape at temperature 1 in just-barely 3D are both asymptotically the same as they are (respectively) at temperature 2 in 2D, the bounds on the directed tile complexity of a thin rectangle at temperature 2 in 2D are not known to hold at temperature 1 in just-barely 3D. Motivated by this discrepancy, we establish new lower and upper bounds on the directed tile complexity of a thin rectangle at temperature 1 in just-barely 3D. We develop a new, more powerful type of Window Movie Lemma that lets us upper bound the number of "sufficiently similar" ways to assign glues to a set of fixed locations. Consequently, our lower bound, $Ω\left(N^{\frac{1}{k}}\right)$, is an asymptotic improvement over the previous best lower bound and is more aesthetically pleasing since it eliminates the $k$ that used to divide $N^{\frac{1}{k}}$. The proof of our upper bound is based on a just-barely 3D, temperature-1 counter, organized according to "digit regions", which affords it roughly fifty percent more digits for the same target rectangle compared to the previous best counter. This increase in digit density results in an upper bound of $O\left(N^{\frac{1}{\left\lfloor\frac{k}{2}\right\rfloor}}+\log N\right)$, that is an asymptotic improvement over the previous best upper bound and roughly the square of our lower bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Optimal program-size complexity for self-assembly at temperature 1 in 3D

Working in a three-dimensional variant of Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model, we show that, for all $N \in \mathbb{N}$, there is a tile set that uniquely self-assembles into an $N \times N$ square shape at temperature 1 with optimal program-size complexity of $O(\log N / \log \log N)$ (the program-size complexity, also known as tile complexity, of a shape is the minimum number of unique tile types required to uniquely self-assemble it). Moreover, our construction is "just barely" 3D in the sense that it works even when the placement of tiles is restricted to the $z = 0$ and $z = 1$ planes. This result affirmatively answers an open question from Cook, Fu, Schweller (SODA 2011). To achieve this result, we develop a general 3D temperature 1 optimal encoding construction, reminiscent of the 2D temperature 2 optimal encoding construction of Soloveichik and Winfree (SICOMP 2007), and perhaps of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Scaled pier fractals do not strictly self-assemble

A \emph{pier fractal} is a discrete self-similar fractal whose generator contains at least one \emph{pier}, that is, a member of the generator with exactly one adjacent point. Tree fractals and pinch-point fractals are special cases of pier fractals. In this paper, we study \emph{scaled pier fractals}, where a \emph{scaled fractal} is the shape obtained by replacing each point in the original fractal by a $c \times c$ block of points, for some $c \in \mathbb{Z}^+$. We prove that no scaled discrete self-similar pier fractal strictly self-assembles, at any temperature, in Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The Power of Duples (in Self-Assembly): It's Not So Hip To Be Square

In this paper we define the Dupled abstract Tile Assembly Model (DaTAM), which is a slight extension to the abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM) that allows for not only the standard square tiles, but also "duple" tiles which are rectangles pre-formed by the joining of two square tiles. We show that the addition of duples allows for powerful behaviors of self-assembling systems at temperature 1, meaning systems which exclude the requirement of cooperative binding by tiles (i.e., the requirement that a tile must be able to bind to at least 2 tiles in an existing assembly if it is to attach). Cooperative binding is conjectured to be required in the standard aTAM for Turing universal computation and the efficient self-assembly of shapes, but we show that in the DaTAM these behaviors can in fact be exhibited at temperature 1. We then show that the DaTAM doesn't provide asymptotic improvements over the aTAM in its ability to efficiently build thin rectangles. Finally, we present a series of results which prove that the temperature-2 aTAM and temperature-1 DaTAM have mutually exclusive powers. That is, each is able to self-assemble shapes that the other can't, and each has systems which cannot be simulated by the other. Beyond being of purely theoretical interest, these results have practical motivation as duples have already proven to be useful in laboratory implementations of DNA-based tiles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The two-handed tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal

The well-studied Two-Handed Tile Assembly Model (2HAM) is a model of tile assembly in which pairs of large assemblies can bind, or self-assemble, together. In order to bind, two assemblies must have matching glues that can simultaneously touch each other, and stick together with strength that is at least the temperature $τ$, where $τ$ is some fixed positive integer. We ask whether the 2HAM is intrinsically universal, in other words we ask: is there a single universal 2HAM tile set $U$ which can be used to simulate any instance of the model? Our main result is a negative answer to this question. We show that for all $τ&#39; < τ$, each temperature-$τ&#39;$ 2HAM tile system does not simulate at least one temperature-$τ$ 2HAM tile system. This impossibility result proves that the 2HAM is not intrinsically universal, in stark contrast to the simpler (single-tile addition only) abstract Tile Assembly Model which is intrinsically universal (&#34;The tile assembly model is intrinsically universal&#34;, FOCS 2012). However, on the positive side, we prove that, for every fixed temperature $τ\geq 2$, temperature-$τ$ 2HAM tile systems are indeed intrinsically universal: in other words, for each $τ$ there is a single universal 2HAM tile set $U$ that, when appropriately initialized, is capable of simulating the behavior of any temperature-$τ$ 2HAM tile system. As a corollary of these results we find an infinite set of infinite hierarchies of 2HAM systems with strictly increasing simulation power within each hierarchy. Finally, we show that for each $τ$, there is a temperature-$τ$ 2HAM system that simultaneously simulates all temperature-$τ$ 2HAM systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Asynchronous Signal Passing for Tile Self-Assembly: Fuel Efficient Computation and Efficient Assembly of Shapes

In this paper we demonstrate the power of a model of tile self-assembly based on active glues which can dynamically change state. We formulate the Signal-passing Tile Assembly Model (STAM), based on the model of Padilla, Liu, and Seeman to be asynchronous, allowing any action of turning a glue on or off, attaching a new tile, or breaking apart an assembly to happen in any order. Within this highly generalized model we provide three new solutions to tile self-assembly problems that have been addressed within the abstract Tile Assembly Model and its variants, showing that signal passing tiles allow for substantial improvement across multiple complexity metrics. Our first result utilizes a recursive assembly process to achieve tile-type efficient assembly of linear structures, using provably fewer tile types than what is possible in standard tile assembly models. Our second system of signal-passing tiles simulates any Turing machine with high fuel efficiency by using only a constant number of tiles per computation step. Our third system assembles the discrete Sierpinski triangle, demonstrating that this pattern can be strictly self-assembled within the STAM. This result is of particular interest in that it is known that this pattern cannot self-assemble within a number of well studied tile self-assembly models. Notably, all of our constructions are at temperature 1, further demonstrating that signal-passing confers the power to bypass many restrictions found in standard tile assembly models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Intrinsic universality in tile self-assembly requires cooperation

We prove a negative result on the power of a model of algorithmic self-assembly for which it has been notoriously difficult to find general techniques and results. Specifically, we prove that Winfree&#39;s abstract Tile Assembly Model, when restricted to use noncooperative tile binding, is not intrinsically universal. This stands in stark contrast to the recent result that, via cooperative binding, the abstract Tile Assembly Model is indeed intrinsically universal. Noncooperative self-assembly, also known as &#34;temperature 1&#34;, is where tiles bind to each other if they match on one or more sides, whereas cooperative binding requires binding on multiple sides. Our result shows that the change from single- to multi-sided binding qualitatively improves the kinds of dynamics and behavior that these models of nanoscale self-assembly are capable of. Our lower bound on simulation power holds in both two and three dimensions; the latter being quite surprising given that three-dimensional noncooperative tile assembly systems simulate Turing machines. On the positive side, we exhibit a three-dimensional noncooperative self-assembly tile set capable of simulating any two-dimensional noncooperative self-assembly system. Our negative result can be interpreted to mean that Turing universal algorithmic behavior in self-assembly does not imply the ability to simulate arbitrary algorithmic self-assembly processes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Efficient Squares and Turing Universality at Temperature 1 with a Unique Negative Glue

Is Winfree&#39;s abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM) &#34;powerful?&#34; Well, if certain tiles are required to &#34;cooperate&#34; in order to be able to bind to a growing tile assembly (a.k.a., temperature 2 self-assembly), then Turing universal computation and the efficient self-assembly of $N \times N$ squares is achievable in the aTAM (Rotemund and Winfree, STOC 2000). So yes, in a computational sense, the aTAM is quite powerful! However, if one completely removes this cooperativity condition (a.k.a., temperature 1 self-assembly), then the computational &#34;power&#34; of the aTAM (i.e., its ability to support Turing universal computation and the efficient self-assembly of $N \times N$ squares) becomes unknown. On the plus side, the aTAM, at temperature 1, isn&#39;t only Turing universal but also supports the efficient self-assembly $N \times N$ squares if self-assembly is allowed to utilize three spatial dimensions (Fu, Schweller and Cook, SODA 2011). We investigate the theoretical &#34;power&#34; of a seemingly simple, restrictive class of tile assembly systems (TASs) in which (1) the absolute value of every glue strength is 1, (2) there&#39;s a single negative strength glue type and (3) unequal glues can&#39;t interact. We call these the \emph{restricted glue} TASs (rgTAS). We first show the tile complexity of producing an $N \times N$ square with an rgTAS is $O(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n})$. We also prove that rgTASs are Turing universal with a construction that simulates an arbitrary Turing machine. Next, we provide results for a variation of the rgTAS class, partially restricted glue TASs, which is similar except that the magnitude of the negative glue&#39;s strength can only assumed to be $\ge 1$. These results consist of a construction with $O(\log n)$ tile complexity for building $N \times N$ squares, and one which simulates a Turing machine but with a greater scaling factor than for the rgTAS construction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The tile assembly model is intrinsically universal

We prove that the abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM) of nanoscale self-assembly is intrinsically universal. This means that there is a single tile assembly system U that, with proper initialization, simulates any tile assembly system T. The simulation is &#34;intrinsic&#34; in the sense that the self-assembly process carried out by U is exactly that carried out by T, with each tile of T represented by an m x m &#34;supertile&#34; of U. Our construction works for the full aTAM at any temperature, and it faithfully simulates the deterministic or nondeterministic behavior of each T. Our construction succeeds by solving an analog of the cell differentiation problem in developmental biology: Each supertile of U, starting with those in the seed assembly, carries the &#34;genome&#34; of the simulated system T. At each location of a potential supertile in the self-assembly of U, a decision is made whether and how to express this genome, i.e., whether to generate a supertile and, if so, which tile of T it will represent. This decision must be achieved using asynchronous communication under incomplete information, but it achieves the correct global outcome(s).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Two Hands Are Better Than One (up to constant factors)

We study the difference between the standard seeded model of tile self-assembly, and the &#34;seedless&#34; two-handed model of tile self-assembly. Most of our results suggest that the two-handed model is more powerful. In particular, we show how to simulate any seeded system with a two-handed system that is essentially just a constant factor larger. We exhibit finite shapes with a busy-beaver separation in the number of distinct tiles required by seeded versus two-handed, and exhibit an infinite shape that can be constructed two-handed but not seeded. Finally, we show that verifying whether a given system uniquely assembles a desired supertile is co-NP-complete in the two-handed model, while it was known to be polynomially solvable in the seeded model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Identifying Shapes Using Self-Assembly (extended abstract)

In this paper, we introduce the following problem in the theory of algorithmic self-assembly: given an input shape as the seed of a tile-based self-assembly system, design a finite tile set that can, in some sense, uniquely identify whether or not the given input shape--drawn from a very general class of shapes--matches a particular target shape. We first study the complexity of correctly identifying squares. Then we investigate the complexity associated with the identification of a considerably more general class of non-square, hole-free shapes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Self-Assembly of Arbitrary Shapes Using RNAse Enzymes: Meeting the Kolmogorov Bound with Small Scale Factor (extended abstract)

We consider a model of algorithmic self-assembly of geometric shapes out of square Wang tiles studied in SODA 2010, in which there are two types of tiles (e.g., constructed out of DNA and RNA material) and one operation that destroys all tiles of a particular type (e.g., an RNAse enzyme destroys all RNA tiles). We show that a single use of this destruction operation enables much more efficient construction of arbitrary shapes. In particular, an arbitrary shape can be constructed using an asymptotically optimal number of distinct tile types (related to the shape&#39;s Kolmogorov complexity), after scaling the shape by only a logarithmic factor. By contrast, without the destruction operation, the best such result has a scale factor at least linear in the size of the shape, and is connected only by a spanning tree of the scaled tiles. We also characterize a large collection of shapes that can be constructed efficiently without any scaling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Strong Fault-Tolerance for Self-Assembly with Fuzzy Temperature

We consider the problem of fault-tolerance in nanoscale algorithmic self-assembly. We employ a variant of Winfree&#39;s abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM), the two-handed aTAM, in which square &#34;tiles&#34; -- a model of molecules constructed from DNA for the purpose of engineering self-assembled nanostructures -- aggregate according to specific binding sites of varying strengths, and in which large aggregations of tiles may attach to each other, in contrast to the seeded aTAM, in which tiles aggregate one at a time to a single specially-designated &#34;seed&#34; assembly. We focus on a major cause of errors in tile-based self-assembly: that of unintended growth due to &#34;weak&#34; strength-1 bonds, which if allowed to persist, may be stabilized by subsequent attachment of neighboring tiles in the sense that at least energy 2 is now required to break apart the resulting assembly; i.e., the errant assembly is stable at temperature 2. We study a common self-assembly benchmark problem, that of assembling an n x n square using O(log n) unique tile types, under the two-handed model of self-assembly. Our main result achieves a much stronger notion of fault-tolerance than those achieved previously. Arbitrary strength-1 growth is allowed (i.e., the temperature is &#34;fuzzy&#34; and may drift from 2 to 1 for arbitrarily long); however, any assembly that grows sufficiently to become stable at temperature 2 is guaranteed to assemble at temperature 2 into the correct final assembly of an n x n square. In other words, errors due to insufficient attachment, which is the cause of errors studied in earlier papers on fault-tolerance, are prevented absolutely in our main construction, rather than only with high probability and for sufficiently small structures, as in previous fault-tolerance studies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access