Researcher profile

Sasmita Patnaik

Sasmita Patnaik contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

On Simplicity of Lie Algebras of Compact Operators: A Direct Approach

We investigate an algebraic variant of the Wojtyński problem on the simplicity of Lie algebras of compact operators on a separable infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space. We prove the non-simplicity of Lie algebras of compact operators under a mild softness condition using the notion of soft-edged operator ideals introduced by Kaftal and Weiss. We believe our study offers a new perspective on the investigation of the simplicity of Lie algebras by relating it to the study of operator ideals.

preprint2013arXiv

$B(H)$-Commutators: A Historical Survey II and recent advances on commutators of compact operators

A sequel to \cite{gW05}, we address again the single commutator problem \cite{PT71} of Pearcy and Topping: Is every compact operator a single commutator of compact operators? by focusing on a 35 year old test question for this posed in 1976 by the last named author and others: Are there any strictly positive operators that are single commutators of compact operators? The latter we settle here affirmatively with a modest modification of Anderson's fundamental construction \cite{jA77} constructing compact operators whose commutator is a rank one projection. Moreover we provide here a rich class of such strictly positive operators that are commutators of compact operators and pose a question for the rest. We explain also how these methods are related to the study of staircase matrix forms, their equivalent block tri-diagonal forms, and commutator problems. In particular, we present the original test question and solution that led to the negative solution of the Pearcy-Topping question on whether or not every trace class trace zero operator was a commutator (or linear combination of commutators) of Hilbert-Schmidt operators. And we show how this evolved from staircase form considerations along with a Larry Brown result on trace connections to ideals \cite{lB94} which itself is at the core of \cite[Section 7]{DFWW}. The omission in \cite{gW05} of this important 35 year old test question was inadvertent and we correct that in this paper. This sequel starts where [ibid] left off but can be read independently of [ibid]. The present paper also has a section on self-commutator equations $[X^*,X]=A$ within the framework of some classical operator Lie algebras. That problem was solved by Fan and Fong (1980) for the full algebra of compact operators, and we solve it here for the complex symplectic Lie algebra of compact operators and for complex semisimple Lie algebras.

preprint2013arXiv

Interplay between Algebraic Groups, Lie Algebras and Operator Ideals

In the framework of operator theory, we investigate a close Lie theoretic relationship between all operator ideals and certain classical groups of invertible operators that can be described as the solution sets of certain algebraic equations, hence can be regarded as infinite-dimensional linear algebraic groups. Historically, this has already been done for only the complete-norm ideals; in that case one can work within the framework of the well-known Lie theory for Banach-Lie groups. That kind of Lie theory is not applicable for arbitrary operator ideals, so we needed to find a new approach for dealing with the general situation. The simplest instance of the aforementioned relationship is provided by the Lie algebra $\ug_{\Ic}(\Hc)=\{X\in\Ic\mid X^*=-X\}$ associated with the group $\U_{\Ic}(\Hc)=\U(\Hc)\cap(\1+\Ic)$ where $\Ic$ is an arbitrary operator ideal in $\Bc(\Hc)$ and $\U(\Hc)$ is the full group of unitary operators. We investigate the Cartan subalgebras (maximal abelian self-adjoint subalgebras) of $\ug_{\Ic}(\Hc)$ for $\{0\}\subsetneqq\Ic\subsetneqq\Bc(\Hc)$, and obtain an uncountably many $\U_{\Ic}(\Hc)$-conjugacy classes of these Cartan subalgebras. The cardinality proof will be given in a follow up paper \cite{BPW13} and stands in contrast to the $\U(\Hc)$-uniqueness work of de la Harpe \cite{dlH72}.