Researcher profile

Sara Crandall

Sara Crandall contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Gaussian Processes, Median Statistics, Milky Way Rotation Curves

We use the Iocco et al. (2015) compilation of 2,780 circular velocity measurements to analyze the Milky Way rotation curve. We find that the error bars for individual measurements are non-gaussian, and hence instead derive median statistics binned central circular velocity values and error bars from these data. We use these median statistics central values and error bars to fit the data to simple, few parameter, rotation curve functions. These simple functions are unable to adequately capture the significant small scale spatial structure in these data and so provide poor fits. We introduce and use the Gaussian Processes (GP) method to capture this small scale structure and use it to derive Milky Way rotation curves from the binned median statistics circular velocity data. The GP method rotation curves have significant small-scale spatial structure superimposed on a broad rise to galactocentric radius $R\approx7$ kpc and a decline at larger $R$. We use the GP method median statistics rotation curve to measure the Oort $A$ and $B$ constants and other characteristic rotation curve quantities. We study correlations in the residual circular velocities (relative to the GP method rotation curve). Along with other evidence for azimuthal asymmetry of the Milky Way circular rotation velocity field, we find that larger residual circular velocities seem to favor parts of spiral arms.

preprint2015arXiv

Non-Gaussian Error Distribution of $\rm{^{7}Li}$ Abundance Measurements

We construct the error distribution of $\rm{^{7}Li}$ abundance measurements for 66 observations (with error bars) used by Spite12 that give $\rm{A(Li)}=2.21 \pm 0.065$ (median and 1$σ$ symmetrized error). This error distribution is somewhat non-Gaussian, with larger probability in the tails than is predicted by a Gaussian distribution. The 95.4% confidence limits are 3.0$σ$ in terms of the quoted errors. We fit the data to four commonly used distributions: Gaussian, Cauchy, Student's t, and double exponential with the center of the distribution found with both weighted mean and median statistics. It is reasonably well described by a widened $n=8$ Student's $t$ distribution. Assuming Gaussianity, the observed A(Li) is 6.5$σ$ away from that expected from standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis given the $Planck$ observations Coc2014. Accounting for the non-Gaussianity of the observed A(Li) error distribution reduces the discrepancy to 4.9$σ$, which is still significant.

preprint2015arXiv

Non-Gaussian Error Distributions of LMC Distance Moduli Measurements

We construct error distributions for a compilation of 232 Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) distance moduli values from de Grijs (2014) that give an LMC distance modulus of (m-M)_{0}=18.49 plus/minus 0.13 mag (median and 1 sigma symmetrized error). Central estimates found from weighted mean and median statistics are used to construct the error distributions. The weighted mean error distribution is non-Gaussian --- flatter and broader than Gaussian --- with more (less) probability in the tails (center) than is predicted by a Gaussian distribution; this could be the consequence of unaccounted-for systematic uncertainties. The median statistics error distribution, which does not make use of the individual measurement errors, is also non-Gaussian --- more peaked than Gaussian --- with less (more) probability in the tails (center) than is predicted by a Gaussian distribution; this could be the consequence of publication bias and/or the non-independence of the measurements. We also construct the error distributions of 247 SMC distance moduli values from de Grijs (2015). We find a central estimate of (m-M)_{0}=18.94 plus/minus 0.14 mag (median and 1 sigma symmetrized error), and similar probabilities for the error distributions.

preprint2013arXiv

Binned Hubble parameter measurements and the cosmological deceleration-acceleration transition

Weighted mean and median statistics techniques are used to combine 23 independent lower redshift, $z<1.04$, Hubble parameter, $H(z)$, measurements and determine binned forms of $H(z)$. When these are combined with 5 higher redshift, $1.3\leqslant z \leqslant 2.3$, $H(z)$ measurements the resulting constraints on cosmological parameters, of three cosmological models, that follow from the weighted-mean binned data are almost identical to those derived from analyses using the 28 independent $H(z)$ measurements. This is consistent with what is expected if the lower redshift measurements errors are Gaussian. Plots of the binned weighted-mean $H(z)/(1+z)$ versus $z$ data are consistent with the presence of a cosmological deceleration-acceleration transition at redshift $z_{\rm da}=0.74 \pm 0.05$ \citep{farooq3}, which is expected in cosmological models with present-epoch energy budget dominated by dark energy as in the standard spatially-flat $Λ$CDM cosmological model.