Source author record

Sanjiv Tokekar

Sanjiv Tokekar appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

Proficient Pair of Replacement Algorithms on L1 and L2 Cache for Merge Sort

Memory hierarchy is used to compete the processors speed. Cache memory is the fast memory which is used to conduit the speed difference of memory and processor. The access patterns of Level 1 cache (L1) and Level 2 cache (L2) are different, when CPU not gets the desired data in L1 then it accesses L2. Thus the replacement algorithm which works efficiently on L1 may not be as efficient on L2. Similarly various applications such as Matrix Multiplication, Web, Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) etc will have varying access pattern. Thus same replacement algorithm for all types of application may not be efficient. This paper works for getting an efficient pair of replacement algorithm on L1 and L2 for the algorithm Merge Sort. With the memory reference string of Merge Sort, we have analyzed the behavior of various existing replacement algorithms on L1. The existing replacement algorithms which are taken into consideration are: Least Recently Used (LRU), Least Frequently Used (LFU) and First In First Out (FIFO). After Analyzing the memory reference pattern of Merge Sort, we have proposed a Partition Based Replacement algorithm (PBR_L1)) on L1 Cache. Furthermore we have analyzed various pairs of algorithms on L1 and L2 respectively, resulting in finding a suitable pair of replacement algorithms. Simulation on L1 shows, among the considered existing replacement algorithms FIFO is performing better than others. While the proposed replacement algorithm PBR_L1 is working about 1.7% to 44 % better than FIFO for various cache sizes.