Source author record

Sandra Paterlini

Sandra Paterlini appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

q-fin.PM q-fin.RM math.ST Methodology q-fin.ST Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

A generalized precision matrix for t-Student distributions in portfolio optimization

The Markowitz model is still the cornerstone of modern portfolio theory. In particular, when focusing on the minimum-variance portfolio, the covariance matrix or better its inverse, the so-called precision matrix, is the only input required. So far, most scholars worked on improving the estimation of the input, however little attention has been given to the limitations of the inverse covariance matrix when capturing the dependence structure in a non-Gaussian setting. While the precision matrix allows to correctly understand the conditional dependence structure of random vectors in a Gaussian setting, the inverse of the covariance matrix might not necessarily result in a reliable source of information when Gaussianity fails. In this paper, exploiting the local dependence function, different definitions of the generalized precision matrix (GPM), which holds for a general class of distributions, are provided. In particular, we focus on the multivariate t-Student distribution and point out that the interaction in random vectors does not depend only on the inverse of the covariance matrix, but also on additional elements. We test the performance of the proposed GPM using a minimum-variance portfolio set-up by considering S\&P 100 and Fama and French industry data. We show that portfolios relying on the GPM often generate statistically significant lower out-of-sample variances than state-of-art methods.

preprint2022arXiv

Environmental, Social, Governance scores and the Missing pillar -- Why does missing information matter?

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores measure companies' performance concerning sustainability and societal impact and are organized on three pillars: Environmental (E), Social (S), and Governance (G). These complementary non-financial ESG scores should provide information about the ESG performance and risks of different companies. However, the extent of not yet published ESG information makes the reliability of ESG scores questionable. To explicitly denote the not yet published information on ESG category scores, a new pillar, the so-called Missing (M) pillar, is formulated. Environmental, Social, Governance, and Missing (ESGM) scores are introduced to consider the potential release of new information in the future. Furthermore, an optimization scheme is proposed to compute ESGM scores, linking them to the companies' riskiness. By relying on the data provided by Refinitiv, we show that the ESGM scores strengthen the companies' risk relationship. These new scores could benefit investors and practitioners as ESG exclusion strategies using only ESG scores might exclude assets with a low score solely because of their missing information and not necessarily because of a low ESG merit.

preprint2021arXiv

New estimation approaches for graphical models with elastic net penalty

In the context of undirected Gaussian graphical models, we introduce three estimators based on elastic net penalty for the underlying dependence graph. Our goal is to estimate the sparse precision matrix, from which to retrieve both the underlying conditional dependence graph and the partial correlation graph. The first estimator is derived from the direct penalization of the precision matrix in the likelihood function, while the second from using conditional penalized regressions to estimate the precision matrix. Finally, the third estimator relies on a 2-stages procedure that estimates the edge set first and then the precision matrix elements. Through simulations we investigate the performances of the proposed methods on a large set of well-known network structures. Empirical results on simulated data show that the 2-stages procedure outperforms all other estimators both w.r.t. estimating the sparsity pattern in the graph and the edges' weights. Finally, using real-world data on US economic sectors, we estimate dependencies and show the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on the network strength.

preprint2015arXiv

Asset Allocation Strategies Based on Penalized Quantile Regression

It is well known that quantile regression model minimizes the portfolio extreme risk, whenever the attention is placed on the estimation of the response variable left quantiles. We show that, by considering the entire conditional distribution of the dependent variable, it is possible to optimize different risk and performance indicators. In particular, we introduce a risk-adjusted profitability measure, useful in evaluating financial portfolios under a pessimistic perspective, since the reward contribution is net of the most favorable outcomes. Moreover, as we consider large portfolios, we also cope with the dimensionality issue by introducing an l1-norm penalty on the assets weights.

preprint2012arXiv

Adaptive Minimax Estimation over Sparse $\ell_q$-Hulls

Given a dictionary of $M_n$ initial estimates of the unknown true regression function, we aim to construct linearly aggregated estimators that target the best performance among all the linear combinations under a sparse $q$-norm ($0 \leq q \leq 1$) constraint on the linear coefficients. Besides identifying the optimal rates of aggregation for these $\ell_q$-aggregation problems, our multi-directional (or universal) aggregation strategies by model mixing or model selection achieve the optimal rates simultaneously over the full range of $0\leq q \leq 1$ for general $M_n$ and upper bound $t_n$ of the $q$-norm. Both random and fixed designs, with known or unknown error variance, are handled, and the $\ell_q$-aggregations examined in this work cover major types of aggregation problems previously studied in the literature. Consequences on minimax-rate adaptive regression under $\ell_q$-constrained true coefficients ($0 \leq q \leq 1$) are also provided. Our results show that the minimax rate of $\ell_q$-aggregation ($0 \leq q \leq 1$) is basically determined by an effective model size, which is a sparsity index that depends on $q$, $t_n$, $M_n$, and the sample size $n$ in an easily interpretable way based on a classical model selection theory that deals with a large number of models. In addition, in the fixed design case, the model selection approach is seen to yield optimal rates of convergence not only in expectation but also with exponential decay of deviation probability. In contrast, the model mixing approach can have leading constant one in front of the target risk in the oracle inequality while not offering optimality in deviation probability.