Source author record

Sandra König

Sandra König appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Artificial Intelligence Cryptography and Security Machine Learning math.PR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

On Game Theory Using Stochastic Tail Orders

We consider a family of distributions on which natural tail orders can be constructed upon a representation of a distribution by a (single) hyper-real number. Past research revealed that the ordering can herein strongly depend on the particular model of the hyperreals, specifically the underlying ultrafilter. Hence, our distribution family is constructed to order invariantly of an ultrafilter. Moreover, we prove that it lies dense in the set of all distributions with the (same) compact support, w.r.t. the supremum norm. Overall, this work resents a correction to [10, 12], in response to recent findings of [2].

preprint2021arXiv

Supervised Machine Learning with Plausible Deniability

We study the question of how well machine learning (ML) models trained on a certain data set provide privacy for the training data, or equivalently, whether it is possible to reverse-engineer the training data from a given ML model. While this is easy to answer negatively in the most general case, it is interesting to note that the protection extends over non-recoverability towards plausible deniability: Given an ML model $f$, we show that one can take a set of purely random training data, and from this define a suitable ``learning rule'' that will produce a ML model that is exactly $f$. Thus, any speculation about which data has been used to train $f$ is deniable upon the claim that any other data could have led to the same results. We corroborate our theoretical finding with practical examples, and open source implementations of how to find the learning rules for a chosen set of raining data.