Source author record

Sandip Singh

Sandip Singh appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Arithmeticity of Some Hypergeometric Monodromy Groups in Sp(4)

The article [14] gives a list of 51 symplectic hypergeometric monodromy groups corresponding to primitive pairs of degree four polynomials, which are products of cyclotomic polynomials, and for which, the absolute value of the leading coefficient of the difference polynomial is greater than 2. It follows from [12] and [14] that 12 of the 51 monodromy groups are arithmetic (cf. Table 1); and the thinness of 13 of the remaining 39 monodromy groups follows from [3] (cf. Table 2). In this article, we show that 15 of the remaining 26 monodromy groups are arithmetic (cf. Table 3).

preprint2015arXiv

Orthogonal Hypergeometric Groups with a Maximally Unipotent Monodromy

Similar to the symplectic cases, there is a family of fourteen orthogonal hypergeometric groups with a maximally unipotent monodromy (cf. Table 1.1). We show that two of the fourteen orthogonal hypergeometric groups associated to the pairs of parameters $(0, 0, 0, 0, 0)$, $(\frac{1}{6}, \frac{1}{6}, \frac{5}{6}, \frac{5}{6}, \frac{1}{2})$; and $(0, 0, 0, 0, 0)$, $(\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{4}, \frac{3}{4}, \frac{3}{4}, \frac{1}{2})$ are arithmetic. We also give a table (cf. Table 2.1) which lists the quadratic forms $\mathrm{Q}$ preserved by these fourteen hypergeometric groups, and their two linearly independent $\mathrm{Q}$- orthogonal isotropic vectors in $\mathbb{Q}^5$; it shows in particular that the orthogonal groups of these quadratic forms have $\mathbb{Q}$- rank two.

preprint2014arXiv

Coxeter Groups are not higher rank Arithmetic Groups

Let W be an irreducible finitely generated Coxeter group. The geometric representation of W in GL(V) provides a discrete embedding in the orthogonal group of the Tits form (the associated bilinear form of the Coxeter group). If the Tits form of the Coxeter group is non-positive and non-degenerate, the Coxeter group does not contain any finite index subgroup isomorphic to an irreducible lattice in a semisimple group of R-rank greater or equal to 2.