Researcher profile

Sandip Singh

Sandip Singh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Arithmeticity of Some Hypergeometric Monodromy Groups in Sp(4)

The article [14] gives a list of 51 symplectic hypergeometric monodromy groups corresponding to primitive pairs of degree four polynomials, which are products of cyclotomic polynomials, and for which, the absolute value of the leading coefficient of the difference polynomial is greater than 2. It follows from [12] and [14] that 12 of the 51 monodromy groups are arithmetic (cf. Table 1); and the thinness of 13 of the remaining 39 monodromy groups follows from [3] (cf. Table 2). In this article, we show that 15 of the remaining 26 monodromy groups are arithmetic (cf. Table 3).

preprint2015arXiv

Orthogonal Hypergeometric Groups with a Maximally Unipotent Monodromy

Similar to the symplectic cases, there is a family of fourteen orthogonal hypergeometric groups with a maximally unipotent monodromy (cf. Table 1.1). We show that two of the fourteen orthogonal hypergeometric groups associated to the pairs of parameters $(0, 0, 0, 0, 0)$, $(\frac{1}{6}, \frac{1}{6}, \frac{5}{6}, \frac{5}{6}, \frac{1}{2})$; and $(0, 0, 0, 0, 0)$, $(\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{4}, \frac{3}{4}, \frac{3}{4}, \frac{1}{2})$ are arithmetic. We also give a table (cf. Table 2.1) which lists the quadratic forms $\mathrm{Q}$ preserved by these fourteen hypergeometric groups, and their two linearly independent $\mathrm{Q}$- orthogonal isotropic vectors in $\mathbb{Q}^5$; it shows in particular that the orthogonal groups of these quadratic forms have $\mathbb{Q}$- rank two.

preprint2014arXiv

Coxeter Groups are not higher rank Arithmetic Groups

Let W be an irreducible finitely generated Coxeter group. The geometric representation of W in GL(V) provides a discrete embedding in the orthogonal group of the Tits form (the associated bilinear form of the Coxeter group). If the Tits form of the Coxeter group is non-positive and non-degenerate, the Coxeter group does not contain any finite index subgroup isomorphic to an irreducible lattice in a semisimple group of R-rank greater or equal to 2.