BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sander J. J. Leemans

Sander J. J. Leemans contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Cryptography and Securitycs.CYMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

An Interdisciplinary Survey on Information Flows in Supply Chains

Supply chains form the backbone of modern economies and therefore require reliable information flows. In practice, however, supply chains face severe technical challenges, especially regarding security and privacy. In this work, we consolidate studies from supply chain management, information systems, and computer science from 2010-2021 in an interdisciplinary meta-survey to make this topic holistically accessible to interdisciplinary research. In particular, we identify a significant potential for computer scientists to remedy technical challenges and improve the robustness of information flows. We subsequently present a concise information flow-focused taxonomy for supply chains before discussing future research directions to provide possible entry points.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Language-Preserving Reduction Rules for Block-Structured Workflow Nets

Process models are used by human analysts to model and analyse behaviour, and by machines to verify properties such as soundness, liveness or other reachability properties, and to compare their expressed behaviour with recorded behaviour within business processes of organisations. For both human and machine use, small models are preferable over large and complex models: for ease of human understanding and to reduce the time spent by machines in state space explorations. Reduction rules that preserve the behaviour of models have been defined for Petri nets, however in this paper we show that a subclass of Petri nets returned by process discovery techniques, that is, block-structured workflow nets, can be further reduced by considering their block structure in process trees. We revisit an existing set of reduction rules for process trees and show that the rules are correct, terminating, confluent and complete, and for which classes of process trees they are and are not complete. In a real-life experiment, we show that these rules can reduce process models discovered from real-life event logs further compared with rules that consider only Petri net structures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access