Source author record

Sandeep S. Kulkarni

Sandeep S. Kulkarni appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

1topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Technical Report: Benefits of Stabilization versus Rollback in Self-Stabilizing Graph-Based Applications on Eventually Consistent Key-Value Stores

In this paper, we evaluate and compare the performance of two approaches, namely self-stabilization and rollback, to handling consistency violating faults (\cvf) that occur when a self-stabilizing distributed graph-based program is executed on an eventually consistent key-value store. Consistency violating faults are caused by reading wrong values due to weaker level of consistency provided by the key-value store. One way to deal with these faults is to utilize rollback whereas another way is to rely on the property of self-stabilization that is expected to provide recovery from arbitrary states. We evaluate both these approaches in different case studies --planar graph coloring, arbitrary graph coloring, and maximal matching-- as well as for different problem dimensions such as input data characteristics, workload partition, and network latency. We also consider the effect of executing non-stabilizing algorithm with rollback with a similar stabilizing algorithm that does not utilize rollback.

preprint2016arXiv

Efficient Timestamps for Capturing Causality

Consider an asynchronous system consisting of processes that communicate via message-passing. The processes communicate over a potentially {\em incomplete} communication network consisting of reliable bidirectional communication channels. Thus, not every pair of processes is necessarily able to communicate with each other directly. % For instance, when the communication network is a {\em star} graph, there is a {\em central} process % that can communicate with all the remaining processes (which are called {\em radial} processes), % but the radial processes cannot communicate with each other directly. The goal of the algorithms discussed in this paper is to assign timestamps to the events at all the processes such that (a) distinct events are assigned distinct timestamps, and (b) the happened-before relationship between the events can be inferred from the timestamps. We consider three types of algorithms for assigning timestamps to events: (i) Online algorithms that must (greedily) assign a timestamp to each event when the event occurs. (ii) Offline algorithms that assign timestamps to event after a finite execution is complete. (iii) Inline algorithms that assign a timestamp to each event when it occurs, but may modify some elements of a timestamp again at a later time. For specific classes of graphs, particularly {\em star} graphs and graphs with connectivity $\geq 1$, the paper presents bounds on the length of vector timestamps assigned by an {\em online} algorithm. The paper then presents an {\em inline} algorithm, which typically assigns substantially smaller timestamps than the optimal-length {\em online} vector timestamps. In particular, the inline algorithm assigns timestamp in the form of a tuple containing $2c+2$ integer elements, where $c$ is the size of the vertex cover for the underlying communication graph.