Source author record

Samuel Micka

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computational Geometry Emerging Technologies

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

Reconstructing Embedded Graphs from Persistence Diagrams

The persistence diagram (PD) is an increasingly popular topological descriptor. By encoding the size and prominence of topological features at varying scales, the PD provides important geometric and topological information about a space. Recent work has shown that well-chosen (finite) sets of PDs can differentiate between geometric simplicial complexes, providing a method for representing complex shapes using a finite set of descriptors. A related inverse problem is the following: given a set of PDs (or an oracle we can query for persistence diagrams), what is underlying geometric simplicial complex? In this paper, we present an algorithm for reconstructing embedded graphs in $\mathbb{R}^d$ (plane graphs in $\mathbb{R}^2$ ) with $n$ vertices from $n^2 - n + d + 1$ directional (augmented) PDs. Additionally, we empirically validate the correctness and time-complexity of our algorithm in $\mathbb{R}^2$ on randomly generated plane graphs using our implementation, and explain the numerical limitations of implementing our algorithm.

preprint2014arXiv

Optimal program-size complexity for self-assembly at temperature 1 in 3D

Working in a three-dimensional variant of Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model, we show that, for all $N \in \mathbb{N}$ , there is a tile set that uniquely self-assembles into an $N \times N$ square shape at temperature 1 with optimal program-size complexity of $O(\log N / \log \log N)$ (the program-size complexity, also known as tile complexity, of a shape is the minimum number of unique tile types required to uniquely self-assemble it). Moreover, our construction is "just barely" 3D in the sense that it works even when the placement of tiles is restricted to the $z = 0$ and $z = 1$ planes. This result affirmatively answers an open question from Cook, Fu, Schweller (SODA 2011). To achieve this result, we develop a general 3D temperature 1 optimal encoding construction, reminiscent of the 2D temperature 2 optimal encoding construction of Soloveichik and Winfree (SICOMP 2007), and perhaps of independent interest.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.