Source author record

Sam Shepherd

Sam Shepherd appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.GR physics.chem-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Imitator homomorphisms for special cube complexes

Central to the theory of special cube complexes is Haglund and Wise's construction of the canonical completion and retraction, which enables one to build finite covers of special cube complexes in a highly controlled manner. In this paper we give a new interpretation of this construction using what we call imitator homomorphisms. This provides fresh insight into the construction and enables us to prove various new results about finite covers of special cube complexes -- most of which generalise existing theorems of Haglund--Wise to the non-hyperbolic setting. In particular, we prove a convex version of omnipotence for virtually special cubulated groups.

preprint2022arXiv

Two generalisations of Leighton's Theorem

Leighton's graph covering theorem says that two finite graphs with a common cover have a common finite cover. We present a new proof of this using groupoids, and use this as a model to prove two generalisations of the theorem. The first generalisation, which we refer to as the symmetry-restricted version, restricts how balls of a given size in the universal cover can map down to the two finite graphs when factoring through the common finite cover - this answers a question of Neumann. Secondly, we consider covers of graphs of spaces (or of more general objects), which leads to an even more general version of Leighton's Theorem. We also compute upper bounds for the sizes of the finite covers obtained in Leighton's Theorem and its generalisations. An appendix by Gardam and Woodhouse provides an alternative proof of the symmetry-restricted version, that uses Haar measure instead of groupoids.

preprint2021arXiv

Hydrogen Bonding and Nuclear Quantum Effects in Clays

Hydrogen bonds are of paramount importance in the chemistry of clays, mediating the interaction between the clay surface and water, and for some materials between separate layers. It is well-established that the accuracy of a computational model for clays depends on the level of theory at which the electronic structure is treated. However, for hydrogen-bonded systems the motion of light H nuclei on the electronic potential energy surface is often affected by quantum delocalization. Using path integral molecular dynamics, we show that nuclear quantum effects lead to a relatively small change in the structure of clays, but one that is comparable to the variation incurred by treating the clay at different levels of electronic structure theory. Accounting for quantum effects weakens the hydrogen bonds in clays, with H-bonds between different layers of the clay affected more than those within the same layer; this is ascribed to the fact that the confinement of an H atom inside a layer is independent of its participation in hydrogen-bonding. More importantly, the weakening of hydrogen bonds by nuclear quantum effects causes changes in the vibrational spectra of these systems, significantly shifting the O--H stretching peaks and meaning that in order to fully understand these spectra by computational modelling, both electronic and nuclear quantum effects must be included. We show that after reparametrization of the popular CLAYFF model for clays, the O--H stretching region of their vibrational spectra better matches the experimental one, with no detriment to the model's agreement with other experimental properties.

preprint2021arXiv

Leighton's Theorem: extensions, limitations, and quasitrees

Leighton's Theorem states that if there is a tree $T$ that covers two finite graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, then there is a finite graph $\hat G$ that is covered by $T$ and covers both $G_1$ and $G_2$. We prove that this result does not extend to regular covers by graphs other than trees. Nor does it extend to non-regular covers by a quasitree, even if the automorphism group of the quasitree contains a uniform lattice. But it does extend to regular coverings by quasitrees.