Source author record

Salem Alqahtani

Salem Alqahtani appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

1topics

1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

BunchBFT: Across-Cluster Consensus Protocol

In this paper, we present BunchBFT Byzantine fault-tolerant state-machine replication for high performance and scalability. At the heart of BunchBFT is a novel design called the cluster-based approach that divides the replicas into clusters of replicas. By combining this cluster-based approach with hierarchical communications across clusters, piggybacking techniques for sending messages across clusters, and decentralized leader election for each cluster, BunchBFT achieves high performance and scalability. We also prove that BunchBFT satisfies the basic safety and liveness properties of Byzantine consensus. We implemented a prototype of BunchBFT in our PaxiBFT framework to show that the BunchBFT can improve the MirBFT's throughput by 10x, depending on the available bandwidth on wide-area links.

preprint2021arXiv

BigBFT: A Multileader Byzantine Fault Tolerance Protocol for High Throughput

This paper describes BigBFT, a multi-leader Byzantine fault tolerance protocol that achieves high throughput and scalable consensus in blockchain systems. BigBFT achieves this by (1) enabling every node to be a leader that can propose and order the blocks in parallel, (2) piggybacking votes within rounds, (3) pipelining blocks across rounds, and (4) using only two communication steps to order blocks in the common case. BigBFT has an amortized communication cost of $O(n)$ over $n$ requests. We evaluate BigBFT's performance both analytically, using back-of-the-envelope load formulas to construct a cost analysis, and also empirically by implementing it in our PaxiBFT framework. Our evaluation compares BigBFT with PBFT, Tendermint, Streamlet, and Hotstuff under various workloads using deployments of 4 to 20 nodes. Our results show that BigBFT outperforms PBFT, Tendermint, Streamlet, and Hotstuff protocols either in terms of latency (by up to $70\%$) or in terms of throughput (by up to $190\%$).