BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Sagar Kale

Sagar Kale appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputational Complexity

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

How to Solve Fair $k$-Center in Massive Data Models

Fueled by massive data, important decision making is being automated with the help of algorithms, therefore, fairness in algorithms has become an especially important research topic. In this work, we design new streaming and distributed algorithms for the fair $k$-center problem that models fair data summarization. The streaming and distributed models of computation have an attractive feature of being able to handle massive data sets that do not fit into main memory. Our main contributions are: (a) the first distributed algorithm; which has provably constant approximation ratio and is extremely parallelizable, and (b) a two-pass streaming algorithm with a provable approximation guarantee matching the best known algorithm (which is not a streaming algorithm). Our algorithms have the advantages of being easy to implement in practice, being fast with linear running times, having very small working memory and communication, and outperforming existing algorithms on several real and synthetic data sets. To complement our distributed algorithm, we also give a hardness result for natural distributed algorithms, which holds for even the special case of $k$-center.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust Algorithms under Adversarial Injections

In this paper, we study streaming and online algorithms in the context of randomness in the input. For several problems, a random order of the input sequence---as opposed to the worst-case order---appears to be a necessary evil in order to prove satisfying guarantees. However, algorithmic techniques that work under this assumption tend to be vulnerable to even small changes in the distribution. For this reason, we propose a new \emph{adversarial injections} model, in which the input is ordered randomly, but an adversary may inject misleading elements at arbitrary positions. We believe that studying algorithms under this much weaker assumption can lead to new insights and, in particular, more robust algorithms. We investigate two classical combinatorial-optimization problems in this model: Maximum matching and cardinality constrained monotone submodular function maximization. Our main technical contribution is a novel streaming algorithm for the latter that computes a $0.55$-approximation. While the algorithm itself is clean and simple, an involved analysis shows that it emulates a subdivision of the input stream which can be used to greatly limit the power of the adversary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Small Space Stream Summary for Matroid Center

In the matroid center problem, which generalizes the $k$-center problem, we need to pick a set of centers that is an independent set of a matroid with rank $r$. We study this problem in streaming, where elements of the ground set arrive in the stream. We first show that any randomized one-pass streaming algorithm that computes a better than $Δ$-approximation for partition-matroid center must use $Ω(r^2)$ bits of space, where $Δ$ is the aspect ratio of the metric and can be arbitrarily large. This shows a quadratic separation between matroid center and $k$-center, for which the Doubling algorithm gives an $8$-approximation using $O(k)$-space and one pass. To complement this, we give a one-pass algorithm for matroid center that stores at most $O(r^2\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon)$ points (viz., stream summary) among which a $(7+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution exists, which can be found by brute force, or a $(17+\varepsilon)$-approximation can be found with an efficient algorithm. If we are allowed a second pass, we can compute a $(3+\varepsilon)$-approximation efficiently; this also achieves almost the known-best approximation ratio (of $3+\varepsilon$) with total running time of $O((nr + r^{3.5})\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon + r^2(\log Δ)/\varepsilon)$, where $n$ is the number of input points. We also consider the problem of matroid center with $z$ outliers and give a one-pass algorithm that outputs a set of $O((r^2+rz)\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon)$ points that contains a $(15+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution. Our techniques extend to knapsack center and knapsack center with outliers in a straightforward way, and we get algorithms that use space linear in the size of a largest feasible set (as opposed to quadratic space for matroid center).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Maximizing a Nonnegative, Monotone, Submodular Function Constrained to Matchings

Submodular functions have many applications. Matchings have many applications. The bitext word alignment problem can be modeled as the problem of maximizing a nonnegative, monotone, submodular function constrained to matchings in a complete bipartite graph where each vertex corresponds to a word in the two input sentences and each edge represents a potential word-to-word translation. We propose a more general problem of maximizing a nonnegative, monotone, submodular function defined on the edge set of a complete graph constrained to matchings; we call this problem the CSM-Matching problem. CSM-Matching also generalizes the maximum-weight matching problem, which has a polynomial-time algorithm; however, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate CSM-Matching within a factor of e/(e-1) by reducing the max k-cover problem to it. Our main result is a simple, greedy, 3-approximation algorithm for CSM-Matching. Then we reduce CSM-Matching to maximizing a nonnegative, monotone, submodular function over two matroids, i.e., CSM-2-Matroids. CSM-2-Matroids has a (2+epsilon)-approximation algorithm - called LSV2. We show that we can find a (4+epsilon)-approximate solution to CSM-Matching using LSV2. We extend this approach to similar problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Submodular Maximization Meets Streaming: Matchings, Matroids, and More

We study the problem of finding a maximum matching in a graph given by an input stream listing its edges in some arbitrary order, where the quantity to be maximized is given by a monotone submodular function on subsets of edges. This problem, which we call maximum submodular-function matching (MSM), is a natural generalization of maximum weight matching (MWM), which is in turn a generalization of maximum cardinality matching (MCM). We give two incomparable algorithms for this problem with space usage falling in the semi-streaming range---they store only $O(n)$ edges, using $O(n\log n)$ working memory---that achieve approximation ratios of $7.75$ in a single pass and $(3+ε)$ in $O(ε^{-3})$ passes respectively. The operations of these algorithms mimic those of Zelke's and McGregor's respective algorithms for MWM; the novelty lies in the analysis for the MSM setting. In fact we identify a general framework for MWM algorithms that allows this kind of adaptation to the broader setting of MSM. In the sequel, we give generalizations of these results where the maximization is over "independent sets" in a very general sense. This generalization captures hypermatchings in hypergraphs as well as independence in the intersection of multiple matroids.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access