BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sadia Asif

Sadia Asif contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceCryptography and SecurityComputation and LanguageComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceMachine LearningMultiagent Systems

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Generative AI Agents for Controllable and Protected Content Creation

The proliferation of generative AI has transformed creative workflows, yet current systems face critical challenges in controllability and content protection. We propose a novel multi-agent framework that addresses both limitations through specialized agent roles and integrated watermarking mechanisms. Unlike existing multi-agent systems focused solely on generation quality, our approach uniquely combines controllable content synthesis with provenance protection during the generation process itself. The framework orchestrates Director/Planner, Generator, Reviewer, Integration, and Protection agents with human-in-the-loop feedback to ensure alignment with user intent while embedding imperceptible digital watermarks. We formalize the pipeline as a joint optimization objective unifying controllability, semantic alignment, and protection robustness. This work contributes to responsible generative AI by positioning multi-agent architectures as a solution for trustworthy creative workflows with built-in ownership tracking and content traceability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Multi-Agent Framework for Controllable and Protected Generative Content Creation: Addressing Copyright and Provenance in AI-Generated Media

The proliferation of generative AI systems creates unprecedented opportunities for content creation while raising critical concerns about controllability, copyright infringement, and content provenance. Current generative models operate as "black boxes" with limited user control and lack built-in mechanisms to protect intellectual property or trace content origin. We propose a novel multi-agent framework that addresses these challenges through specialized agent roles and integrated watermarking. Our system orchestrates Director, Generator, Reviewer, Integration, and Protection agents to ensure user intent alignment while embedding digital provenance markers. We demonstrate feasibility through two case studies: creative content generation with iterative refinement and copyright protection for AI-generated art in commercial contexts. Preliminary feasibility evidence from prior work indicates up to 23\% improvement in semantic alignment and 95\% watermark recovery rates. This work contributes to responsible generative AI deployment, positioning multi-agent systems as a solution for trustworthy creative workflows in legal and commercial applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs

Fine-tuning safety-aligned language models for downstream tasks often leads to substantial degradation of refusal behavior, making models vulnerable to adversarial misuse. While prior work has shown that safety-relevant features are encoded in structured representations within the model's activation space, how these representations change during fine-tuning and why alignment degrades remains poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the representation-level mechanisms underlying alignment degradation. Our analysis shows that standard fine-tuning induces systematic drift in safety-relevant representations, distorts their geometric structure, and introduces interference between task optimization and safety features. These effects collectively lead to increased harmful compliance. Motivated by these findings, we introduce REFUSALGUARD, a representation-level fine-tuning framework that preserves safety-relevant structure during model adaptation. Our approach constrains updates in hidden representation space, ensuring that safety-mediating components remain stable while allowing task-specific learning in complementary directions. We evaluate REFUSALGUARD across multiple model families, including LLaMA, Gemma, and Qwen, on adversarial safety benchmarks such as AdvBench, DirectHarm4, and JailbreakBench, as well as downstream utility tasks. Our approach achieves attack success rates comparable to base safety-aligned models while maintaining competitive task performance, significantly outperforming baselines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access