Source author record

S Uma Sankar

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

hep-ph hep-ex

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2019arXiv

Resolving $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ anomalies

The current world averages of the ratios $R_{D^{(*)}}$ are about $4σ$ away from their Standard Model prediction. These measurements indicate towards the violation of lepton flavor universality in $b\rightarrow c\,l\,\barν$ decay. The different new physics operators, which can explain the $R_{D^{(*)}}$ measurements, have been identified previously. We show that a simultaneous measurement of the polarization fractions of $τ$ and $D^*$ and the angular asymmetries $A_{FB}$ and $A_{LT}$ in $B\rightarrow D^*τ\barν$ decay can distinguish all the new physics amplitudes and hence uniquely identify the Lorentz structure of new physics.

preprint2019arXiv

Solutions to $R_D$ - $R_{D^*}$ in light of Belle 2019 data

Earlier this year, the Belle collaboration presented their new measurements of $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ using a new method. These measurements are consistent with the Standard Model predictions, whereas the global averages of the earlier measurements had a $4.1σ$ discrepancy. With the inclusion of the new data in the global averages, the discrepancy comes down to $3.1σ$ . In this work, we study the study the new physics solutions to the $R_D$ - $R_{D^*}$ anomaly allowed by the reduction in the discrepancy. Among the four fermion operators, which arise through a single particle exchange, only the $(V-A)$ operator solution survives. We found three additional solutions with two dis-similar operators. The branching ratio of $B_c\rightarrow τ\,\barν$ is powerful discriminant between these four allowed solutions.

preprint2009arXiv

Mass Hierarchy Determination for $θ_{13}=0$ and Atmospheric Neutrinos

We examine the possibility of determining the neutrino mass hierarchy in the limit θ_{13} = 0 using atmospheric neutrinos as the source. In this limit, in which θ_{13} driven matter effects are absent, independent measurements of Δ_{31} and Δ_{32} can, in principle, lead to hierarchy determination. Since the difference between these two is Δ_{21}, one needs an experimental arrangement where Δ_{21} L/E \gtrsim 1 can be achieved. This condition can be satisfied by atmospheric neutrinos since they have a large range of energies and baselines. In spite of this, we find that hierarchy determination in the θ_{13}=0 limit with atmospheric neutrinos is not a realistic possibility, even in conjunction with an apparently synergistic beam experiment like T2K or NOvA. We discuss the reasons for this, and also in the process clarify the conditions that must be satisfied in general for hierarchy determination if θ_{13} = 0.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

S Uma Sankar

Research overview

Is this your work?

3 publications

Resolving $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ anomalies

Solutions to $R_D$ - $R_{D^*}$ in light of Belle 2019 data

Mass Hierarchy Determination for $θ_{13}=0$ and Atmospheric Neutrinos

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

S Uma Sankar

Research overview

Is this your work?

3 publications

Resolving RDR_DRD​ and RD∗R_{D^*}RD∗​ anomalies

Solutions to RDR_DRD​-RD∗R_{D^*}RD∗​ in light of Belle 2019 data

Mass Hierarchy Determination for θ13=0θ_{13}=0θ13​=0 and Atmospheric Neutrinos

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Resolving $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ anomalies

Solutions to $R_D$ - $R_{D^*}$ in light of Belle 2019 data

Mass Hierarchy Determination for $θ_{13}=0$ and Atmospheric Neutrinos