BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

S. Stanley Young

S. Stanley Young contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applicationscs.CY

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

EPA Particulate Matter Data -- Analyses using Local Control Strategy

Statistical Learning methodology for analysis of large collections of cross-sectional observational data can be most effective when the approach used is both Nonparametric and Unsupervised. We illustrate use of our NU Learning approach on 2016 US environmental epidemiology data that we have made freely available. We encourage other researchers to download these data, apply whatever methodology they wish, and contribute to development of a broad-based ``consensus view'' of potential effects of Secondary Organic Aerosols (volatile organic compounds of predominantly biogenic or anthropogenic origin) within PM2.5 particulate matter on circulatory and/or respiratory mortality. Our analyses here focus on the question: ``Are regions with relatively high air-borne biogenic particulate matter also expected to have relatively high circulatory and/or respiratory mortality?''

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Air quality and acute deaths in California, 2000-2012

Many studies have sought to determine if there is an association between air quality and acute deaths. Many consider it plausible that current levels of air quality cause acute deaths. However, several factors call causation and even association into question. Observational data sets are large and complex. Multiple testing and multiple modeling can lead to false positive findings. Publication, confirmation and other biases are also possible problems. Moreover, the fact that most data sets used in studies evaluating the relationships among air quality and public health outcomes are not publicly available makes reproducing the claims nearly impossible. Here we have built and made publicly available a dataset containing daily air quality levels, PM2.5 and ozone, daily temperature levels, minimum and maximum and daily relative humidity levels for the eight most populous California air basins. We analyzed the dataset using a moving median analysis, a standard time series analysis, and a prediction analysis within the following analysis strategy. We examine the eight air basins separately to see if estimates replicate across locations. We use leave one year out cross validation analysis to evaluate predictions. Both the moving medians analysis and the standard time series analysis found little evidence for association between air quality and acute deaths. The prediction analysis process was a run as a large factorial design using different models and holding out one year at a time. Among the variables used to predict acute death, most of the daily death variability was explained by time of year or weather variables. In summary, the empirical evidence is that current levels of air quality, ozone and PM2.5, are not causally related to acute deaths for California. An empirical and logical case can be made air quality is not causally related to acute deaths for the rest of the United States.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Bias and response heterogeneity in an air quality data set

It is well-known that claims coming from observational studies often fail to replicate when rigorously re-tested. The technical problems include multiple testing, multiple modeling and bias. Any or all of these problems can give rise to claims that will fail to replicate. There is a need for statistical methods that are easily applied, are easy to understand, and are likely to give reliable results. In particular, simple ways for reducing the influence of bias are essential. In this paper, the Local Control method developed by Robert Obenchain is explicated using a small air quality/longevity data set first analyzed in the New England Journal of Medicine. The benefits of our paper are twofold. First, we describe a reliable strategy for analysis of observational data. Second and importantly, the global claim that longevity increases with improvements in air quality made in the NEJM paper needs to be modified. There is subgroup heterogeneity in the effect of air quality on longevity (one size does not fit all), and this heterogeneity is largely explained by factors other than air quality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access