BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Robert L. Obenchain

Robert L. Obenchain contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applicationscs.CYMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

EPA Particulate Matter Data -- Analyses using Local Control Strategy

Statistical Learning methodology for analysis of large collections of cross-sectional observational data can be most effective when the approach used is both Nonparametric and Unsupervised. We illustrate use of our NU Learning approach on 2016 US environmental epidemiology data that we have made freely available. We encourage other researchers to download these data, apply whatever methodology they wish, and contribute to development of a broad-based ``consensus view'' of potential effects of Secondary Organic Aerosols (volatile organic compounds of predominantly biogenic or anthropogenic origin) within PM2.5 particulate matter on circulatory and/or respiratory mortality. Our analyses here focus on the question: ``Are regions with relatively high air-borne biogenic particulate matter also expected to have relatively high circulatory and/or respiratory mortality?''

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Affine Reduction of Dimensionality: An Origin-Centric Perspective

We consider statistical methods for reduction of multivariate dimensionality that have invariance and/or commutativity properties under the affine group of transformations (origin translations plus linear combinations of coordinates along initial axes). The methods discussed here differ from traditional principal component and coordinate approaches in that they are origin-centric. Because all Cartesian coordinates of the origin are zero, it is the unique fixed point for subsequent linear transformations of point scatters. Whenever visualizations allow shifting between and/or combining of Cartesian and polar coordinate representations, as in Biplots, the location of this origin is critical. Specifically, origin-centric visualizations enhance the psychology of graphical perception by yielding scatters that can be interpreted as Dyson swarms. The key factor is typically the analyst's choice of origin via an initial "centering" translation; this choice determines whether the recovered scatter will have either no points depicted as being near the origin or else one (or more) points exactly coincident with this origin.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Bias and response heterogeneity in an air quality data set

It is well-known that claims coming from observational studies often fail to replicate when rigorously re-tested. The technical problems include multiple testing, multiple modeling and bias. Any or all of these problems can give rise to claims that will fail to replicate. There is a need for statistical methods that are easily applied, are easy to understand, and are likely to give reliable results. In particular, simple ways for reducing the influence of bias are essential. In this paper, the Local Control method developed by Robert Obenchain is explicated using a small air quality/longevity data set first analyzed in the New England Journal of Medicine. The benefits of our paper are twofold. First, we describe a reliable strategy for analysis of observational data. Second and importantly, the global claim that longevity increases with improvements in air quality made in the NEJM paper needs to be modified. There is subgroup heterogeneity in the effect of air quality on longevity (one size does not fit all), and this heterogeneity is largely explained by factors other than air quality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access