Researcher profile

Ryota Eguchi

Ryota Eguchi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Fast Neighborhood Rendezvous

In the rendezvous problem, two computing entities (called \emph{agents}) located at different vertices in a graph have to meet at the same vertex. In this paper, we consider the synchronous \emph{neighborhood rendezvous problem}, where the agents are initially located at two adjacent vertices. While this problem can be trivially solved in $O(Δ)$ rounds ($Δ$ is the maximum degree of the graph), it is highly challenging to reveal whether that problem can be solved in $o(Δ)$ rounds, even assuming the rich computational capability of agents. The only known result is that the time complexity of $O(\sqrt{n})$ rounds is achievable if the graph is complete and agents are probabilistic, asymmetric, and can use whiteboards placed at vertices. Our main contribution is to clarify the situation (with respect to computational models and graph classes) admitting such a sublinear-time rendezvous algorithm. More precisely, we present two algorithms achieving fast rendezvous additionally assuming bounded minimum degree, unique vertex identifier, accessibility to neighborhood IDs, and randomization. The first algorithm runs within $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nΔ/δ} + n/δ)$ rounds for graphs of the minimum degree larger than $\sqrt{n}$, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph, and $δ$ is the minimum degree of the graph. The second algorithm assumes that the largest vertex ID is $O(n)$, and achieves $\tilde{O}\left( \frac{n}{\sqrtδ} \right)$-round time complexity without using whiteboards. These algorithms attain $o(Δ)$-round complexity in the case of $δ= ω(\sqrt{n} \log n)$ and $δ= ω(n^{2/3} \log^{4/3} n)$ respectively.

preprint2020arXiv

Time-optimal Loosely-stabilizing Leader Election in Population Protocols

We consider the leader election problem in population protocol models. In pragmatic settings of population protocols, self-stabilization is a highly desired feature owing to its fault resilience and the benefit of initialization freedom. However, the design of self-stabilizing leader election is possible only under a strong assumption (i.e. the knowledge of the \emph{exact} size of a network) and rich computational resources (i.e. the number of states). Loose-stabilization, introduced by Sudo et al [Theoretical Computer Science, 2012], is a promising relaxed concept of self-stabilization to address the aforementioned issue. Loose-stabilization guarantees that starting from any configuration, the network will reach a safe configuration where a single leader exists within a short time, and thereafter it will maintain the single leader for a long time, but not forever. The main contribution of the paper is a time-optimal loosely-stabilizing leader election protocol. While the shortest convergence time achieved so far in loosely-stabilizing leader election is $O(\log^3 n)$ parallel time, the proposed protocol with design parameter $τ\ge 1$ attains $O(τ\log n)$ parallel convergence time and $Ω(n^τ)$ parallel holding time (i.e. the length of the period keeping the unique leader), both in expectation. This protocol is time-optimal in the sense of both the convergence and holding times in expectation because any loosely-stabilizing leader election protocol with the same length of the holding time is known to require $Ω(τ\log n)$ parallel time.