BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Russell Power

Russell Power contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingProgramming Languages

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

How fast can we make interpreted Python?

Python is a popular dynamic language with a large part of its appeal coming from powerful libraries and extension modules. These augment the language and make it a productive environment for a wide variety of tasks, ranging from web development (Django) to numerical analysis (NumPy). Unfortunately, Python's performance is quite poor when compared to modern implementations of languages such as Lua and JavaScript. Why does Python lag so far behind these other languages? As we show, the very same API and extension libraries that make Python a powerful language also make it very difficult to efficiently execute. Given that we want to retain access to the great extension libraries that already exist for Python, how fast can we make it? To evaluate this, we designed and implemented Falcon, a high-performance bytecode interpreter fully compatible with the standard CPython interpreter. Falcon applies a number of well known optimizations and introduces several new techniques to speed up execution of Python bytecode. In our evaluation, we found Falcon an average of 25% faster than the standard Python interpreter on most benchmarks and in some cases about 2.5X faster.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Making Systems More Robust with Flexible RPC Lookup

Modern distributed systems use names everywhere. Lockservices such as Chubby and ZooKeeper provide an effective mechanism for mapping from application names to server instances, but proper usage of them requires a large amount of error-prone boiler-plate code. Application programmers often try to write wrappers to abstract away this logic, but it turns out there is a more general and easier way of handling the issue. We show that by extending the existing name resolution capabilities of RPC libraries, we can remove the need for such annoying boiler-plate code while at the same time making our services more robust.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Using Memory-Protection to Simplify Zero-copy Operations

High performance networks (e.g. Infiniband) rely on zero-copy operations for performance. Zero-copy operations, as the name implies, avoid copying buffers for sending and receiving data. Instead, hardware devices directly read and write to application specified areas of memory. Since these networks can send and receive at nearly the same speed as the memory bus inside machines, zero-copy operations are necessary to achieve peak performance for many applications. Unfortunately, programming with zero-copy APIs is a *giant pain*. Users must carefully avoid using buffers that may be accessed by a device. Typically this either results in spaghetti code (where every access to a buffer is checked before usage), or blocking operations (which pretty much defeat the whole point of zero-copy). We show that by abusing memory protection hardware, we can offer the best of both worlds: a simple zero-copy mechanism which allows for non-blocking send and receives while protecting against incorrect accesses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access