Researcher profile

Rolf Huesmann

Rolf Huesmann contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

$crypto_{lib}$: Comparing and selecting cryptography libraries (long version of EICC 2022 publication)

Selecting a library out of numerous candidates can be a laborious and resource-intensive task. We present the $crypto_{lib}$ index, a tool for decision-makers to choose the best fitting cryptography library for a given context. To define our index, 15 library attributes were synthesized from findings based on a literature review and interviews with decision-makers. These attributes were afterwards validated and weighted via an online survey. In order to create the index value for a given library, the individual attributes are assessed using given evaluation criteria associated with the respective attribute. As a proof of concept and to give a practical usage example, the derivation of the $crypto_{lib}$ values for the libraries Bouncy Castle and Tink are shown in detail. Overall, by tailoring the weighting of the $crypto_{lib}$ attributes to their current use case, decision-makers are enabled to systematically select a cryptography library fitting best to their software project at hand in a guided, repeatable and reliable way.

preprint2021arXiv

Mobile Touchless Fingerprint Recognition: Implementation, Performance and Usability Aspects

This work presents an automated touchless fingerprint recognition system for smartphones. We provide a comprehensive description of the entire recognition pipeline and discuss important requirements for a fully automated capturing system. Also, our implementation is made publicly available for research purposes. During a database acquisition, a total number of 1,360 touchless and touch-based samples of 29 subjects are captured in two different environmental situations. Experiments on the acquired database show a comparable performance of our touchless scheme and the touch-based baseline scheme under constrained environmental influences. A comparative usability study on both capturing device types indicates that the majority of subjects prefer the touchless capturing method. Based on our experimental results we analyze the impact of the current COVID-19 pandemic on fingerprint recognition systems. Finally, implementation aspects of touchless fingerprint recognition are summarized.

preprint2020arXiv

Zur Benutzbarkeit und Verwendung von API-Dokumentationen

A good documentation is essential for a good usability of (security) APIs, i.e. especially for the correct use of the APIs. Requirements for good documentation of APIs have been described in several papers, but there is no technical implementation (hereinafter referred to as a documentation system) that implements these requirements. The requirements can be divided into requirements for the documentation system and requirements for the documentation content. Out of 13 identified requirements for a documentation system itself, 9 were implemented in a prototype and evaluated in a user study with 22 test persons using a cryptographic API. It turned out that the implementation of the requirement 'Enable quick use of the API' depends on the one hand on the quality of the content entered, but on the other hand also includes 5 other requirements or their implementation. The two other implemented requirements ('classic reference' and 'question and answer function') were hardly or not at all used by the test persons. Their usefulness and relevance should be investigated in a long-term study.