Source author record

Andreas Heinemann

Andreas Heinemann appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

$crypto_{lib}$: Comparing and selecting cryptography libraries (long version of EICC 2022 publication)

Selecting a library out of numerous candidates can be a laborious and resource-intensive task. We present the $crypto_{lib}$ index, a tool for decision-makers to choose the best fitting cryptography library for a given context. To define our index, 15 library attributes were synthesized from findings based on a literature review and interviews with decision-makers. These attributes were afterwards validated and weighted via an online survey. In order to create the index value for a given library, the individual attributes are assessed using given evaluation criteria associated with the respective attribute. As a proof of concept and to give a practical usage example, the derivation of the $crypto_{lib}$ values for the libraries Bouncy Castle and Tink are shown in detail. Overall, by tailoring the weighting of the $crypto_{lib}$ attributes to their current use case, decision-makers are enabled to systematically select a cryptography library fitting best to their software project at hand in a guided, repeatable and reliable way.

preprint2021arXiv

Zur Integration von Post-Quantum Verfahren in bestehende Softwareprodukte

Currently, PQC algorithms are being standardized to address the emerging threat to conventional asymmetric algorithms from quantum computing. These new algorithms must then be integrated into existing protocols, applications and infrastructures. Integration problems are to be expected, due to incompatibilities with existing standards and implementations on the one hand, but also due to a lack of knowledge among software developers about how to handle PQC algorithms. To illustrate incompatibilities, we integrate two different PQC algorithms into two different existing software products (the InboxPager email client for the Android OS and the TLS implementation of the Bouncy Castle crypto library). Here, we rely on the highly-abstract crypto library eUCRITE, which hides technical details about the correct usage of classical and PCQ algorithms and thus prevents some potential implementation errors.

preprint2020arXiv

Zur Benutzbarkeit und Verwendung von API-Dokumentationen

A good documentation is essential for a good usability of (security) APIs, i.e. especially for the correct use of the APIs. Requirements for good documentation of APIs have been described in several papers, but there is no technical implementation (hereinafter referred to as a documentation system) that implements these requirements. The requirements can be divided into requirements for the documentation system and requirements for the documentation content. Out of 13 identified requirements for a documentation system itself, 9 were implemented in a prototype and evaluated in a user study with 22 test persons using a cryptographic API. It turned out that the implementation of the requirement 'Enable quick use of the API' depends on the one hand on the quality of the content entered, but on the other hand also includes 5 other requirements or their implementation. The two other implemented requirements ('classic reference' and 'question and answer function') were hardly or not at all used by the test persons. Their usefulness and relevance should be investigated in a long-term study.