BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Rohit Babbar

Rohit Babbar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningInformation Retrieval

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Missing Labels, Long-tails and Propensities in Extreme Multi-label Classification

The propensity model introduced by Jain et al. 2016 has become a standard approach for dealing with missing and long-tail labels in extreme multi-label classification (XMLC). In this paper, we critically revise this approach showing that despite its theoretical soundness, its application in contemporary XMLC works is debatable. We exhaustively discuss the flaws of the propensity-based approach, and present several recipes, some of them related to solutions used in search engines and recommender systems, that we believe constitute promising alternatives to be followed in XMLC.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Unbiased Loss Functions for Extreme Classification With Missing Labels

The goal in extreme multi-label classification (XMC) is to tag an instance with a small subset of relevant labels from an extremely large set of possible labels. In addition to the computational burden arising from large number of training instances, features and labels, problems in XMC are faced with two statistical challenges, (i) large number of 'tail-labels' -- those which occur very infrequently, and (ii) missing labels as it is virtually impossible to manually assign every relevant label to an instance. In this work, we derive an unbiased estimator for general formulation of loss functions which decompose over labels, and then infer the forms for commonly used loss functions such as hinge- and squared-hinge-loss and binary cross-entropy loss. We show that the derived unbiased estimators, in the form of appropriate weighting factors, can be easily incorporated in state-of-the-art algorithms for extreme classification, thereby scaling to datasets with hundreds of thousand labels. However, empirically, we find a slightly altered version that gives more relative weight to tail labels to perform even better. We suspect is due to the label imbalance in the dataset, which is not explicitly addressed by our theoretically derived estimator. Minimizing the proposed loss functions leads to significant improvement over existing methods (up to 20% in some cases) on benchmark datasets in XMC.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access