BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Robert Wisbauer

Robert Wisbauer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CTmath.RAmath.QA

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Generalised bialgebras and entwined monads and comonads

Jean-Louis Loday has defined generalised bialgebras and proved structure theorems in this setting which can be seen as general forms of the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt and the Cartier-Milnor-Moore theorems. It was observed by the present authors that parts of the theory of generalised bialgebras are special cases of results on entwined monads and comonads and the corresponding mixed bimodules. In this article the Rigidity Theorem of Loday is extended to this more general categorical framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Galois functors and generalised Hopf modules

As shown in a previous paper by the same authors, the theory of Galois functors provides a categorical framework for the characterisation of bimonads on any category as Hopf monads and also for the characterisation of opmonoidal monads on monoidal categories as right Hopf monads in the sense of Bruguieres and Virelizier. Hereby the central part is to describe conditions under which a comparison functor between the base category and the category of Hopf modules becomes an equivalence (Fundamental Theorem). For monoidal categories, Aguiar and Chase extended the setting by replacing the base category by a comodule category for some comonoid and considering a comparison functor to generalised Hopf modules. For duoidal categories, Bohm, Chen and Zhang investigated a comparison functor to the Hopf modules over a bimonoid induced by the two monoidal structures given in such categories. In both approaches fundamental theorems are proved and the purpose of this paper is to show that these can be derived from the theory of Galois functors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Regular pairings of functors and weak (co)monads

For functors $L:\A\to \B$ and $R:\B\to \A$ between any categories $\A$ and $\B$, a {\em pairing} is defined by maps, natural in $A\in \A$ and $B\in \B$, $$\xymatrix{\Mor_\B (L(A),B) \ar@<0.5ex>[r]^α & \Mor_\A (A,R(B))\ar@<0.5ex>[l]^β}.$$ $(L,R)$ is an {\em adjoint pair} provided $α$ (or $β$) is a bijection. In this case the composition $RL$ defines a monad on the category $\A$, $LR$ defines a comonad on the category $\B$, and there is a well-known correspondence between monads (or comonads) and adjoint pairs of functors. For various applications it was observed that the conditions for a unit of a monad was too restrictive and weakening it still allowed for a useful generalised notion of a monad. This led to the introduction of {\em weak monads} and {\em weak comonads} and the definitions needed were made without referring to this kind of adjunction. The motivation for the present paper is to show that these notions can be naturally derived from pairings of functors $(L,R,α,β)$ with $α= α\dcirc β\dcirc α$ and $β= β\dcircα\dcircβ$. Following closely the constructions known for monads (and unital modules) and comonads (and counital comodules), we show that any weak (co)monad on $\A$ gives rise to a regular pairing between $\A$ and the category of {\em compatible (co)modules}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Notes on bimonads and Hopf monads

For a generalisation of the classical theory of Hopf algebra over fields, A. Bruguières and A. Virelizier study opmonoidal monads on monoidal categories (which they called {\em bimonads}). In a recent joint paper with S. Lack the same authors define the notion of a {\em pre-Hopf monad} by requiring only a special form of the fusion operator to be invertible. In previous papers it was observed by the present authors that bimonads yield a special case %Hopf monads may be considered as a special case of an entwining of a pair of functors (on arbitrary categories). The purpose of this note is to show that in this setting the pre-Hopf monads are a special case of Galois entwinings. As a byproduct some new properties are detected which make a (general) bimonad on a Cauchy complete category to a Hopf monad. In the final section applications to cartesian monoidal categories are considered.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

On Rational Pairings of Functors

In the theory of coalgebras $C$ over a ring $R$, the rational functor relates the category of modules over the algebra $C^*$ (with convolution product) with the category of comodules over $C$. It is based on the pairing of the algebra $C^*$ with the coalgebra $C$ provided by the evaluation map $\ev:C^*\ot_R C\to R$. We generalise this situation by defining a {\em pairing} between endofunctors $T$ and $G$ on any category $\A$ as a map, natural in $a,b\in \A$, $$β_{a,b}:\A(a, G(b)) \to \A(T(a),b),$$ and we call it {\em rational} if these all are injective. In case $\bT=(T,m_T,e_T)$ is a monad and $\bG=(G,δ_G,\ve_G)$ is a comonad on $\A$, additional compatibility conditions are imposed on a pairing between $\bT$ and $\bG$. If such a pairing is given and is rational, and $\bT$ has a right adjoint monad $\bT^\di$, we construct a {\em rational functor} as the functor-part of an idempotent comonad on the $\bT$-modules $\A_{\rT}$ which generalises the crucial properties of the rational functor for coalgebras. As a special case we consider pairings on monoidal categories.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Monads and comonads in module categories

Let $A$ be a ring and $\M_A$ the category of $A$-modules. It is well known in module theory that for any $A $-bimodule $B$, $B$ is an $A$-ring if and only if the functor $-\otimes_A B: \M_A\to \M_A$ is a monad (or triple). Similarly, an $A $-bimodule $\C$ is an $A$-coring provided the functor $-\otimes_A\C:\M_A\to \M_A$ is a comonad (or cotriple). The related categories of modules (or algebras) of $-\otimes_A B$ and comodules (or coalgebras) of $-\otimes_A\C$ are well studied in the literature. On the other hand, the right adjoint endofunctors $\Hom_A(B,-)$ and $\Hom_A(\C,-)$ are a comonad and a monad, respectively, but the corresponding (co)module categories did not find much attention so far. The category of $\Hom_A(B,-)$-comodules is isomorphic to the category of $B$-modules, while the category of $\Hom_A(\C,-)$-modules (called $\C$-contramodules by Eilenberg and Moore) need not be equivalent to the category of $\C$-comodules. The purpose of this paper is to investigate these categories and their relationships based on some observations of the categorical background. This leads to a deeper understanding and characterisations of algebraic structures such as corings, bialgebras and Hopf algebras. For example, it turns out that the categories of $\C$-comodules and $\Hom_A(\C,-)$-modules are equivalent provided $\C$ is a coseparable coring. Furthermore, a bialgebra $H$ over a commutative ring $R$ is a Hopf algebra if and only if $\Hom_R(H-)$ is a Hopf bimonad on $\M_R$ and in this case the categories of $H$-Hopf modules and mixed $\Hom_R(H,-)$-bimodules are both equivalent to $\M_R$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access