Source author record

Robert P. W. Duin

Robert P. W. Duin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Machine Learning Computer Vision

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Zero-error dissimilarity based classifiers

We consider general non-Euclidean distance measures between real world objects that need to be classified. It is assumed that objects are represented by distances to other objects only. Conditions for zero-error dissimilarity based classifiers are derived. Additional conditions are given under which the zero-error decision boundary is a continues function of the distances to a finite set of training samples. These conditions affect the objects as well as the distance measure used. It is argued that they can be met in practice.

preprint2012arXiv

A Two-Stage Combined Classifier in Scale Space Texture Classification

Textures often show multiscale properties and hence multiscale techniques are considered useful for texture analysis. Scale-space theory as a biologically motivated approach may be used to construct multiscale textures. In this paper various ways are studied to combine features on different scales for texture classification of small image patches. We use the N-jet of derivatives up to the second order at different scales to generate distinct pattern representations (DPR) of feature subsets. Each feature subset in the DPR is given to a base classifier (BC) of a two-stage combined classifier. The decisions made by these BCs are combined in two stages over scales and derivatives. Various combining systems and their significances and differences are discussed. The learning curves are used to evaluate the performances. We found for small sample sizes combining classifiers performs significantly better than combining feature spaces (CFS). It is also shown that combining classifiers performs better than the support vector machine on CFS in multiscale texture classification.