Researcher profile

Robert Kusner

Robert Kusner contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Steklov Eigenspaces for Free Boundary Minimal Surfaces in the Unit Ball

We develop new methods to compare the span $\mathcal{C}(Σ)$ of the coordinate functions on a free boundary minimal submanifold $Σ$ embedded in the unit $n$-ball $\mathbb{B}^n$ with its first Steklov eigenspace $\mathcal{E}_{σ_1}(Σ)$. Using these methods, we show that $\mathcal{C}(A)=\mathcal{E}_{σ_1}(A)$ for any embedded free boundary minimal annulus $A$ in $\mathbb{B}^3$ invariant under the antipodal map, and thus prove that $A$ is congruent to the critical catenoid. We also confirm that $\mathcal{C}=\mathcal{E}_{σ_1}$ for any free boundary minimal surface embedded in $\mathbb{B}^3$ with the symmetries of many known or expected examples, including: examples of any positive genus from stacking at least three disks; two infinite families of genus $0$ examples with dihedral symmetry, as well as a finite family with the various Platonic symmetries; and examples of any genus by desingularizing several disks that meet at equal angles along a diameter of the ball.

preprint2020arXiv

Chirality for crooked curves

Chiral objects rotate when placed in a collimated flow or wind. We exploit this hydrodynamic intuition to construct a tensorial chirality measure for rigid filaments and curves. This tensor is trace-free, so if a curve has a right-handed twist about some axis, there is a perpendicular axis about which the twist is left-handed. Our measure places minimal requirements on the smoothness of the curve, hence it can be readily used to quantify chirality for biomolecules and polymers, polygonal and rectifiable curves, and other discrete geometrical structures.

preprint2020arXiv

Numerical Methods for Biomembranes: conforming subdivision methods versus non-conforming PL methods

The Canham-Helfrich-Evans models of biomembranes consist of a family of geometric constrained variational problems. In this article, we compare two classes of numerical methods for these variational problems based on piecewise linear (PL) and subdivision surfaces (SS). Since SS methods are based on spline approximation and can be viewed as higher order versions of PL methods, one may expect that the only difference between the two methods is in the accuracy order. In this paper, we prove that a numerical method based on minimizing any one of the `PL Willmore energies' proposed in the literature would fail to converge to a solution of the continuous problem, whereas a method based on minimization of the bona fide Willmore energy, well-defined for SS but not PL surfaces, succeeds. Motivated by this analysis, we propose also a regularization method for the PL method based on techniques from conformal geometry. We address a number of implementation issues crucial for the efficiency of our solver. A software package called Wmincon accompanies this article, provides parallel implementations of all the relevant geometric functionals. When combined with a standard constrained optimization solver, the geometric variational problems can then be solved numerically. To this end, we realize that some of the available optimization algorithms/solvers are capable of preserving symmetry, while others manage to break symmetry; we explore the consequences of this observation.