Researcher profile

Andrew Zigerelli

Andrew Zigerelli contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Adversarial Prefetch: New Cross-Core Cache Side Channel Attacks

Modern x86 processors have many prefetch instructions that can be used by programmers to boost performance. However, these instructions may also cause security problems. In particular, we found that on Intel processors, there are two security flaws in the implementation of PREFETCHW, an instruction for accelerating future writes. First, this instruction can execute on data with read-only permission. Second, the execution time of this instruction leaks the current coherence state of the target data. Based on these two design issues, we build two cross-core private cache attacks that work with both inclusive and non-inclusive LLCs, named Prefetch+Reload and Prefetch+Prefetch. We demonstrate the significance of our attacks in different scenarios. First, in the covert channel case, Prefetch+Reload and Prefetch+Prefetch achieve 782 KB/s and 822 KB/s channel capacities, when using only one shared cache line between the sender and receiver, the largest-to-date single-line capacities for CPU cache covert channels. Further, in the side channel case, our attacks can monitor the access pattern of the victim on the same processor, with almost zero error rate. We show that they can be used to leak private information of real-world applications such as cryptographic keys. Finally, our attacks can be used in transient execution attacks in order to leak more secrets within the transient window than prior work. From the experimental results, our attacks allow leaking about 2 times as many secret bytes, compared to Flush+Reload, which is widely used in transient execution attacks.

preprint2020arXiv

Numerical Methods for Biomembranes: conforming subdivision methods versus non-conforming PL methods

The Canham-Helfrich-Evans models of biomembranes consist of a family of geometric constrained variational problems. In this article, we compare two classes of numerical methods for these variational problems based on piecewise linear (PL) and subdivision surfaces (SS). Since SS methods are based on spline approximation and can be viewed as higher order versions of PL methods, one may expect that the only difference between the two methods is in the accuracy order. In this paper, we prove that a numerical method based on minimizing any one of the `PL Willmore energies' proposed in the literature would fail to converge to a solution of the continuous problem, whereas a method based on minimization of the bona fide Willmore energy, well-defined for SS but not PL surfaces, succeeds. Motivated by this analysis, we propose also a regularization method for the PL method based on techniques from conformal geometry. We address a number of implementation issues crucial for the efficiency of our solver. A software package called Wmincon accompanies this article, provides parallel implementations of all the relevant geometric functionals. When combined with a standard constrained optimization solver, the geometric variational problems can then be solved numerically. To this end, we realize that some of the available optimization algorithms/solvers are capable of preserving symmetry, while others manage to break symmetry; we explore the consequences of this observation.