Source author record

Robert Coulter

Robert Coulter appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

More on the number of distinct values of a class of functions

In a previous article the authors determined the best-known upper bound for the cardinality of the image set for several classes of functions, including planar functions. Here, we show that the upper bound cannot be tight for planar functions over finite fields. This follows from a more general result proving that the upper bound cannot be tight for a much larger class of functions over an abelian group of order $y^n$ with $n>1$. Moreover, the tightness of the upper bound for the larger class of functions is equivalent to the existence of planar difference sets. To obtain better upper bounds, we first completely resolve an optimization problem involving the partitioning of a number into triangular parts. Our solution, which is algorithmic and constructive, allows us to determine tight upper bounds provided the relevant parameters are given explicitly. We also provide a suite of upper bounds which can be applied across a range of parameters. These are established via a well-studied Diophantine equation and are related to class numbers of quadratic number fields.

preprint2013arXiv

On the number of distinct values of a class of functions with finite domain

By relating the number of images of a function with finite domain to a certain parameter, we obtain both an upper and lower bound for the image set. Even though the arguments are elementary, the bounds are, in some sense, best possible. The upper bound is also connected to triangular numbers, and a slight improvement to this bound could be obtained by resolving a problem on them. In the final section, we consider implications of our bounds in various settings, including finite fields, coding theory and additive combinatorics. In particular, we obtain the first non-trivial upper bound for the image set of a planar function over a finite field; this bound is better than the bound implied by the Dembowski-Ostrom conjecture.