BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Richik Chakraborty

Richik Chakraborty contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyQuantitative MethodsApplicationsCryptography and Securitymath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Beyond P-Values: Importing Quantitative Finance's Risk and Regret Metrics for AI in Learning Health Systems

The increasing deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical settings challenges foundational assumptions underlying traditional frameworks of medical evidence. Classical statistical approaches, centered on randomized controlled trials, frequentist hypothesis testing, and static confidence intervals, were designed for fixed interventions evaluated under stable conditions. In contrast, AI-driven clinical systems learn continuously, adapt their behavior over time, and operate in non-stationary environments shaped by evolving populations, practices, and feedback effects. In such systems, clinical harm arises less from average error rates than from calibration drift, rare but severe failures, and the accumulation of suboptimal decisions over time. In this perspective, we argue that prevailing notions of statistical significance are insufficient for characterizing evidence and safety in learning health systems. Drawing on risk-theoretic concepts from quantitative finance and online decision theory, we propose reframing medical evidence for adaptive AI systems in terms of time-indexed calibration stability, bounded downside risk, and controlled cumulative regret. We emphasize that this approach does not replace randomized trials or causal inference, but complements them by addressing dimensions of risk and uncertainty that emerge only after deployment. This framework provides a principled mathematical language for evaluating AI-driven clinical systems under continual learning and offers implications for clinical practice, research design, and regulatory oversight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Privacy-Preserving Cohort Analytics for Personalized Health Platforms: A Differentially Private Framework with Stochastic Risk Modeling

Personalized health analytics increasingly rely on population benchmarks to provide contextual insights such as ''How do I compare to others like me?'' However, cohort-based aggregation of health data introduces nontrivial privacy risks, particularly in interactive and longitudinal digital platforms. Existing privacy frameworks such as $k$-anonymity and differential privacy provide essential but largely static guarantees that do not fully capture the cumulative, distributional, and tail-dominated nature of re-identification risk in deployed systems. In this work, we present a privacy-preserving cohort analytics framework that combines deterministic cohort constraints, differential privacy mechanisms, and synthetic baseline generation to enable personalized population comparisons while maintaining strong privacy protections. We further introduce a stochastic risk modeling approach that treats re-identification risk as a random variable evolving over time, enabling distributional evaluation through Monte Carlo simulation. Adapting quantitative risk measures from financial mathematics, we define Privacy Loss at Risk (P-VaR) to characterize worst-case privacy outcomes under realistic cohort dynamics and adversary assumptions. We validate our framework through system-level analysis and simulation experiments, demonstrating how privacy-utility tradeoffs can be operationalized for digital health platforms. Our results suggest that stochastic risk modeling complements formal privacy guarantees by providing interpretable, decision-relevant metrics for platform designers, regulators, and clinical informatics stakeholders.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Progressive Bayesian Confidence Architectures for Cold-Start Personal Health Analytics: Formalizing Early Insight Through Posterior Contraction and Risk-Aware Interpretation

Personal health analytics systems face a persistent cold-start dilemma: users expect meaningful insights early in data collection, while conventional statistical inference requires data volumes that often exceed engagement horizons. Existing approaches either delay inference until fixed statistical thresholds are met -- leading to user disengagement -- or surface heuristic insights without formal uncertainty quantification, risking false confidence. We propose a progressive Bayesian confidence architecture that formalizes early-stage inference through phased interpretation of posterior uncertainty. Drawing on Bayesian updating and epistemic strategies from financial risk modeling under sparse observations, we map posterior contraction to interpretable tiers of insight, ranging from exploratory directional evidence to robust associative inference. We demonstrate the framework&#39;s performance through controlled experimentation with synthetic N-of-1 health data, showing that calibrated early insights can be generated within 5--7 days while maintaining explicit epistemic humility. Compared to fixed-threshold baselines requiring 30+ days of data, the proposed approach yields earlier directional signals (mean: 5.3 vs 31.7 days, p<0.001) while controlling false discovery rates below 6% (5.9% at day 30) despite 26-day earlier detection, compared to 0% FDR for fixed-threshold baselines that delay insights by 30 days. In addition, we show strong uncertainty calibration (76% credible interval coverage for ground-truth correlations at day 90). This work contributes a methodological framework for uncertainty-aware early inference in personalized health analytics that bridges the gap between user engagement requirements and statistical rigor.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access