Researcher profile

Riccardo Benedetti

Riccardo Benedetti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

The topology of Helmholtz domains

The goal of this paper is to describe and clarify as much as possible the 3-dimensional topology underlying the Helmholtz cuts method, which occurs in a wide theoretic and applied literature about Electromagnetism, Fluid dynamics and Elasticity on domains of the ordinary space. We consider two classes of bounded domains that satisfy mild boundary conditions and that become "simple" after a finite number of disjoint cuts along properly embedded surfaces. For the first class (Helmholtz), "simple" means that every curl-free smooth vector field admits a potential. For the second (weakly-Helmholtz), we only require that a potential exists for the restriction of every curl-free smooth vector field defined on the whole initial domain. By means of classical and rather elementary facts of 3-dimensional geometric and algebraic topology, we give an exhaustive description of Helmholtz domains, realizing that their topology is forced to be quite elementary (in particular, Helmholtz domains with connected boundary are just possibly knotted handlebodies, and the complement of any non-trivial link is not Helmholtz). The discussion about weakly-Helmholtz domains is a bit more advanced, and their classification appears to be a quite difficult issue. Nevertheless, we provide several interesting characterizations of them and, in particular, we point out that the class of links with weakly-Helmholtz complements eventually coincides with the class of the so-called homology boundary links, that have been widely studied in Knot Theory.

preprint1999arXiv

Reidemeister Torsion of 3-Dimensional Euler Structures with Simple Boundary Tangency and Legendrian Knots

We generalize Turaev's definition of torsion invariants of pairs $(M,ξ)$, where $M$ is a 3-dimensional manifold and $ξ$ is an Euler structure on $M$ (a non-singular vector field up to homotopy relative to the boundary of $M$ and local modifications in the interior of $M$). Namely, we allow $M$ to have arbitrary boundary and $ξ$ to have simple (convex and/or concave) tangency circles to the boundary. We prove that Turaev's $H_1(M)$-equivariance formula holds also in our generalized context. Our torsions apply in particular to (the exterior of) Legendrian links (in particular, knots) in contact 3-manifolds, and we prove that they can distinguish knots which are isotopic as framed knots but not as Legendrian knots. Using the combinatorial encoding of vector fields based on branched standard spines we show how to explicitly invert Turaev's reconstruction map from combinatorial to smooth Euler structures, thus making the computation of torsions a more effective one. As an example we work out a specific computation.

preprint1998arXiv

Branched Spines and Contact Structures on 3-manifolds

We introduce and analyze the characteristic foliation induced by a contact structure on a branched surface, in particular a branched standard spine of a 3-manifold. We extend to (fairly general) singular foliations of branched surfaces the local existence and uniqueness results which hold for genuine surfaces. Moreover we show that global uniqueness holds when restricting to tight structures. We establish branched versions of the elimination lemma. We prove a smooth version of the Gillman-Rolfsen PL-embedding theorem, deducing that branched spines can be used to construct contact structures in a given homotopy class of plane fields.