BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Raymond J. Mooney

Raymond J. Mooney appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computation and LanguageComputer VisionMachine LearningSoftware EngineeringArtificial Intelligence

Catalog footprint

What is connected

14works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Impact of Evaluation Methodologies on Code Summarization

There has been a growing interest in developing machine learning (ML) models for code summarization tasks, e.g., comment generation and method naming. Despite substantial increase in the effectiveness of ML models, the evaluation methodologies, i.e., the way people split datasets into training, validation, and test sets, were not well studied. Specifically, no prior work on code summarization considered the timestamps of code and comments during evaluation. This may lead to evaluations that are inconsistent with the intended use cases. In this paper, we introduce the time-segmented evaluation methodology, which is novel to the code summarization research community, and compare it with the mixed-project and cross-project methodologies that have been commonly used. Each methodology can be mapped to some use cases, and the time-segmented methodology should be adopted in the evaluation of ML models for code summarization. To assess the impact of methodologies, we collect a dataset of (code, comment) pairs with timestamps to train and evaluate several recent ML models for code summarization. Our experiments show that different methodologies lead to conflicting evaluation results. We invite the community to expand the set of methodologies used in evaluations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Learning to Describe Solutions for Bug Reports Based on Developer Discussions

When a software bug is reported, developers engage in a discussion to collaboratively resolve it. While the solution is likely formulated within the discussion, it is often buried in a large amount of text, making it difficult to comprehend and delaying its implementation. To expedite bug resolution, we propose generating a concise natural language description of the solution by synthesizing relevant content within the discussion, which encompasses both natural language and source code. We build a corpus for this task using a novel technique for obtaining noisy supervision from repository changes linked to bug reports, with which we establish benchmarks. We also design two systems for generating a description during an ongoing discussion by classifying when sufficient context for performing the task emerges in real-time. With automated and human evaluation, we find this task to form an ideal testbed for complex reasoning in long, bimodal dialogue context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Towards Automated Error Analysis: Learning to Characterize Errors

Characterizing the patterns of errors that a system makes helps researchers focus future development on increasing its accuracy and robustness. We propose a novel form of "meta learning" that automatically learns interpretable rules that characterize the types of errors that a system makes, and demonstrate these rules' ability to help understand and improve two NLP systems. Our approach works by collecting error cases on validation data, extracting meta-features describing these samples, and finally learning rules that characterize errors using these features. We apply our approach to VilBERT, for Visual Question Answering, and RoBERTa, for Common Sense Question Answering. Our system learns interpretable rules that provide insights into systemic errors these systems make on the given tasks. Using these insights, we are also able to "close the loop" and modestly improve performance of these systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Dialog as a Vehicle for Lifelong Learning

Dialog systems research has primarily been focused around two main types of applications - task-oriented dialog systems that learn to use clarification to aid in understanding a goal, and open-ended dialog systems that are expected to carry out unconstrained "chit chat" conversations. However, dialog interactions can also be used to obtain various types of knowledge that can be used to improve an underlying language understanding system, or other machine learning systems that the dialog acts over. In this position paper, we present the problem of designing dialog systems that enable lifelong learning as an important challenge problem, in particular for applications involving physically situated robots. We include examples of prior work in this direction, and discuss challenges that remain to be addressed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Generating Question Relevant Captions to Aid Visual Question Answering

Visual question answering (VQA) and image captioning require a shared body of general knowledge connecting language and vision. We present a novel approach to improve VQA performance that exploits this connection by jointly generating captions that are targeted to help answer a specific visual question. The model is trained using an existing caption dataset by automatically determining question-relevant captions using an online gradient-based method. Experimental results on the VQA v2 challenge demonstrates that our approach obtains state-of-the-art VQA performance (e.g. 68.4% on the Test-standard set using a single model) by simultaneously generating question-relevant captions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hidden State Guidance: Improving Image Captioning using An Image Conditioned Autoencoder

Most RNN-based image captioning models receive supervision on the output words to mimic human captions. Therefore, the hidden states can only receive noisy gradient signals via layers of back-propagation through time, leading to less accurate generated captions. Consequently, we propose a novel framework, Hidden State Guidance (HSG), that matches the hidden states in the caption decoder to those in a teacher decoder trained on an easier task of autoencoding the captions conditioned on the image. During training with the REINFORCE algorithm, the conventional rewards are sentence-based evaluation metrics equally distributed to each generated word, no matter their relevance. HSG provides a word-level reward that helps the model learn better hidden representations. Experimental results demonstrate that HSG clearly outperforms various state-of-the-art caption decoders using either raw images or detected objects as inputs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improving VQA and its Explanations \\ by Comparing Competing Explanations

Most recent state-of-the-art Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems are opaque black boxes that are only trained to fit the answer distribution given the question and visual content. As a result, these systems frequently take shortcuts, focusing on simple visual concepts or question priors. This phenomenon becomes more problematic as the questions become complex that requires more reasoning and commonsense knowledge. To address this issue, we present a novel framework that uses explanations for competing answers to help VQA systems select the correct answer. By training on human textual explanations, our framework builds better representations for the questions and visual content, and then reweights confidences in the answer candidates using either generated or retrieved explanations from the training set. We evaluate our framework on the VQA-X dataset, which has more difficult questions with human explanations, achieving new state-of-the-art results on both VQA and its explanations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Learning to Update Natural Language Comments Based on Code Changes

We formulate the novel task of automatically updating an existing natural language comment based on changes in the body of code it accompanies. We propose an approach that learns to correlate changes across two distinct language representations, to generate a sequence of edits that are applied to the existing comment to reflect the source code modifications. We train and evaluate our model using a dataset that we collected from commit histories of open-source software projects, with each example consisting of a concurrent update to a method and its corresponding comment. We compare our approach against multiple baselines using both automatic metrics and human evaluation. Results reflect the challenge of this task and that our model outperforms baselines with respect to making edits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Self-Critical Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answering

Visual Question Answering (VQA) deep-learning systems tend to capture superficial statistical correlations in the training data because of strong language priors and fail to generalize to test data with a significantly different question-answer (QA) distribution. To address this issue, we introduce a self-critical training objective that ensures that visual explanations of correct answers match the most influential image regions more than other competitive answer candidates. The influential regions are either determined from human visual/textual explanations or automatically from just significant words in the question and answer. We evaluate our approach on the VQA generalization task using the VQA-CP dataset, achieving a new state-of-the-art i.e., 49.5% using textual explanations and 48.5% using automatically annotated regions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Representing Meaning with a Combination of Logical and Distributional Models

NLP tasks differ in the semantic information they require, and at this time no single se- mantic representation fulfills all requirements. Logic-based representations characterize sentence structure, but do not capture the graded aspect of meaning. Distributional models give graded similarity ratings for words and phrases, but do not capture sentence structure in the same detail as logic-based approaches. So it has been argued that the two are complementary. We adopt a hybrid approach that combines logic-based and distributional semantics through probabilistic logic inference in Markov Logic Networks (MLNs). In this paper, we focus on the three components of a practical system integrating logical and distributional models: 1) Parsing and task representation is the logic-based part where input problems are represented in probabilistic logic. This is quite different from representing them in standard first-order logic. 2) For knowledge base construction we form weighted inference rules. We integrate and compare distributional information with other sources, notably WordNet and an existing paraphrase collection. In particular, we use our system to evaluate distributional lexical entailment approaches. We use a variant of Robinson resolution to determine the necessary inference rules. More sources can easily be added by mapping them to logical rules; our system learns a resource-specific weight that corrects for scaling differences between resources. 3) In discussing probabilistic inference, we show how to solve the inference problems efficiently. To evaluate our approach, we use the task of textual entailment (RTE), which can utilize the strengths of both logic-based and distributional representations. In particular we focus on the SICK dataset, where we achieve state-of-the-art results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Stacking With Auxiliary Features

Ensembling methods are well known for improving prediction accuracy. However, they are limited in the sense that they cannot discriminate among component models effectively. In this paper, we propose stacking with auxiliary features that learns to fuse relevant information from multiple systems to improve performance. Auxiliary features enable the stacker to rely on systems that not just agree on an output but also the provenance of the output. We demonstrate our approach on three very different and difficult problems -- the Cold Start Slot Filling, the Tri-lingual Entity Discovery and Linking and the ImageNet object detection tasks. We obtain new state-of-the-art results on the first two tasks and substantial improvements on the detection task, thus verifying the power and generality of our approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Supervised and Unsupervised Ensembling for Knowledge Base Population

We present results on combining supervised and unsupervised methods to ensemble multiple systems for two popular Knowledge Base Population (KBP) tasks, Cold Start Slot Filling (CSSF) and Tri-lingual Entity Discovery and Linking (TEDL). We demonstrate that our combined system along with auxiliary features outperforms the best performing system for both tasks in the 2015 competition, several ensembling baselines, as well as the state-of-the-art stacking approach to ensembling KBP systems. The success of our technique on two different and challenging problems demonstrates the power and generality of our combined approach to ensembling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Using Sentence-Level LSTM Language Models for Script Inference

There is a small but growing body of research on statistical scripts, models of event sequences that allow probabilistic inference of implicit events from documents. These systems operate on structured verb-argument events produced by an NLP pipeline. We compare these systems with recent Recurrent Neural Net models that directly operate on raw tokens to predict sentences, finding the latter to be roughly comparable to the former in terms of predicting missing events in documents.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Training a Multilingual Sportscaster: Using Perceptual Context to Learn Language

We present a novel framework for learning to interpret and generate language using only perceptual context as supervision. We demonstrate its capabilities by developing a system that learns to sportscast simulated robot soccer games in both English and Korean without any language-specific prior knowledge. Training employs only ambiguous supervision consisting of a stream of descriptive textual comments and a sequence of events extracted from the simulation trace. The system simultaneously establishes correspondences between individual comments and the events that they describe while building a translation model that supports both parsing and generation. We also present a novel algorithm for learning which events are worth describing. Human evaluations of the generated commentaries indicate they are of reasonable quality and in some cases even on par with those produced by humans for our limited domain.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access