Source author record

Ramesh Hariharan

Ramesh Hariharan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

A General Framework for Graph Sparsification

Given a weighted graph $G$ and an error parameter $ε> 0$, the {\em graph sparsification} problem requires sampling edges in $G$ and giving the sampled edges appropriate weights to obtain a sparse graph $G_ε$ (containing O(n\log n) edges in expectation) with the following property: the weight of every cut in $G_ε$ is within a factor of $(1\pm ε)$ of the weight of the corresponding cut in $G$. We provide a generic framework that sets out sufficient conditions for any particular sampling scheme to result in good sparsifiers, and obtain a set of results by simple instantiations of this framework. The results we obtain include the following: (1) We improve the time complexity of graph sparsification from O(m\log^3 n) to O(m + n\log^4 n) for graphs with polynomial edge weights. (2) We improve the time complexity of graph sparsification from O(m\log^3 n) to O(m\log^2 n) for graphs with arbitrary edge weights. (3) If the size of the sparsifier is allowed to be O(n\log^2 n/ε^2) instead of O(n\log n/ε^2), we improve the time complexity of sparsification to O(m) for graphs with polynomial edge weights. (4) We show that sampling using standard connectivities results in good sparsifiers, thus resolving an open question of Benczur and Karger. As a corollary, we give a simple proof of (a slightly weaker version of) a result due to Spielman and Srivastava showing that sampling using effective resistances produces good sparsifiers. (5) We give a simple proof showing that sampling using strong connectivities results in good sparsifiers, a result obtained previously using a more involved proof by Benczur and Karger. A key ingredient of our proofs is a generalization of bounds on the number of small cuts in an undirected graph due to Karger; this generalization might be of independent interest.

preprint2010arXiv

A Linear-time Algorithm for Sparsification of Unweighted Graphs

Given an undirected graph $G$ and an error parameter $ε> 0$, the {\em graph sparsification} problem requires sampling edges in $G$ and giving the sampled edges appropriate weights to obtain a sparse graph $G_ε$ with the following property: the weight of every cut in $G_ε$ is within a factor of $(1\pm ε)$ of the weight of the corresponding cut in $G$. If $G$ is unweighted, an $O(m\log n)$-time algorithm for constructing $G_ε$ with $O(n\log n/ε^2)$ edges in expectation, and an $O(m)$-time algorithm for constructing $G_ε$ with $O(n\log^2 n/ε^2)$ edges in expectation have recently been developed (Hariharan-Panigrahi, 2010). In this paper, we improve these results by giving an $O(m)$-time algorithm for constructing $G_ε$ with $O(n\log n/ε^2)$ edges in expectation, for unweighted graphs. Our algorithm is optimal in terms of its time complexity; further, no efficient algorithm is known for constructing a sparser $G_ε$. Our algorithm is Monte-Carlo, i.e. it produces the correct output with high probability, as are all efficient graph sparsification algorithms.