BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Rajsekhar Mohapatra

Rajsekhar Mohapatra contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.GAphysics.flu-dynastro-ph.COphysics.ao-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Multiphase turbulence in galactic halos: effect of the driving

Supernova explosions, active galactic nuclei jets, galaxy--galaxy interactions and cluster mergers can drive turbulence in the circumgalactic medium (CGM) and in the intracluster medium (ICM). However, the exact nature of turbulence forced by these sources and its impact on the different statistical properties of the CGM/ICM and their global thermodynamics is still unclear. To investigate the effects of different types of forcing, we conduct high resolution ($1008^3$ resolution elements) idealised hydrodynamic simulations with purely solenoidal (divergence-free) forcing, purely compressive (curl-free) forcing, and natural mixture forcing (equal fractions of the two components). The simulations also include radiative cooling. We study the impact of the three different forcing modes (sol, comp, mix) on the morphology of the gas, its temperature and density distributions, sources and sinks of enstrophy, i.e., solenoidal motions, as well as the kinematics of hot ($\sim10^7~\mathrm{K}$) X-ray emitting and cold ($\sim10^4~\mathrm{K}$) H$α$ emitting gas. We find that compressive forcing leads to stronger variations in density and temperature of the gas as compared to solenoidal forcing. The cold phase gas forms large-scale filamentary structures for compressive forcing and misty, small-scale clouds for solenoidal forcing. The cold phase gas has stronger large-scale velocities for compressive forcing. The natural mixture forcing shows kinematics and gas distributions intermediate between the two extremes, the cold-phase gas occurs as both large-scale filaments and small-scale misty clouds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Turbulence in stratified atmospheres: implications for the intracluster medium

The gas motions in the intracluster medium (ICM) are governed by stratified turbulence. Stratified turbulence is fundamentally different from Kolmogorov (isotropic, homogeneous) turbulence; kinetic energy not only cascades from large to small scales, but it is also converted into buoyancy potential energy. To understand the density and velocity fluctuations in the ICM, we conduct high-resolution ($1024^2\times 1536$ grid points) hydrodynamical simulations of subsonic turbulence (with rms Mach number $\mathcal{M}\approx 0.25$) and different levels of stratification, quantified by the Richardson number $\mathrm{Ri}$, from $\mathrm{Ri}=0$ (no stratification) to $\mathrm{Ri}=13$ (strong stratification). We quantify the density, pressure and velocity fields for varying stratification because observational studies often use surface brightness fluctuations to infer the turbulent gas velocities of the ICM. We find that the standard deviation of the logarithmic density fluctuations ($σ_s$), where $s=\ln(ρ/\left<ρ(z)\right>)$, increases with $\mathrm{Ri}$. For weakly stratified subsonic turbulence ($\mathrm{Ri}\lesssim10$, $\mathcal{M}<1$), we derive a new $σ_s$--$\mathcal{M}$--$\mathrm{Ri}$ relation, $σ_s^2=\ln(1+b^2\mathcal{M}^4+0.09\mathcal{M}^2\mathrm{Ri}H_P/H_S)$, where $b=1/3$--$1$ is the turbulence driving parameter, and $H_P$ and $H_S$ are the pressure and entropy scale heights respectively. We further find that the power spectrum of density fluctuations, $P(ρ_k/\left<ρ\right>)$, increases in magnitude with increasing $\mathrm{Ri}$, whereas the velocity power spectrum is invariant. Thus, the ratio between density and velocity power spectra strongly depends on $\mathrm{Ri}$. Pressure fluctuations, on the other hand, are independent of stratification and only depend on $\mathcal{M}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access