Researcher profile

Raj Gaire

Raj Gaire contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Collaborative analysis of genomic data: vision and challenges

The cost of DNA sequencing has resulted in a surge of genetic data being utilised to improve scientific research, clinical procedures, and healthcare delivery in recent years. Since the human genome can uniquely identify an individual, this characteristic also raises security and privacy concerns. In order to balance the risks and benefits, governance mechanisms including regulatory and ethical controls have been established, which are prone to human errors and create hindrance for collaboration. Over the past decade, technological methods are also catching up that can support critical discoveries responsibly. In this paper, we explore regulations and ethical guidelines and propose our visions of secure/private genomic data storage/processing/sharing platforms. Then, we present some available techniques and a conceptual system model that can support our visions. Finally, we highlight the open issues that need further investigation.

preprint2022arXiv

Profiler: Profile-Based Model to Detect Phishing Emails

Email phishing has become more prevalent and grows more sophisticated over time. To combat this rise, many machine learning (ML) algorithms for detecting phishing emails have been developed. However, due to the limited email data sets on which these algorithms train, they are not adept at recognising varied attacks and, thus, suffer from concept drift; attackers can introduce small changes in the statistical characteristics of their emails or websites to successfully bypass detection. Over time, a gap develops between the reported accuracy from literature and the algorithm's actual effectiveness in the real world. This realises itself in frequent false positive and false negative classifications. To this end, we propose a multidimensional risk assessment of emails to reduce the feasibility of an attacker adapting their email and avoiding detection. This horizontal approach to email phishing detection profiles an incoming email on its main features. We develop a risk assessment framework that includes three models which analyse an email's (1) threat level, (2) cognitive manipulation, and (3) email type, which we combine to return the final risk assessment score. The Profiler does not require large data sets to train on to be effective and its analysis of varied email features reduces the impact of concept drift. Our Profiler can be used in conjunction with ML approaches, to reduce their misclassifications or as a labeller for large email data sets in the training stage. We evaluate the efficacy of the Profiler against a machine learning ensemble using state-of-the-art ML algorithms on a data set of 9000 legitimate and 900 phishing emails from a large Australian research organisation. Our results indicate that the Profiler's mitigates the impact of concept drift, and delivers 30% less false positive and 25% less false negative email classifications over the ML ensemble's approach.

preprint2022arXiv

Towards Web Phishing Detection Limitations and Mitigation

Web phishing remains a serious cyber threat responsible for most data breaches. Machine Learning (ML)-based anti-phishing detectors are seen as an effective countermeasure, and are increasingly adopted by web-browsers and software products. However, with an average of 10K phishing links reported per hour to platforms such as PhishTank and VirusTotal (VT), the deficiencies of such ML-based solutions are laid bare. We first explore how phishing sites bypass ML-based detection with a deep dive into 13K phishing pages targeting major brands such as Facebook. Results show successful evasion is caused by: (1) use of benign services to obscure phishing URLs; (2) high similarity between the HTML structures of phishing and benign pages; (3) hiding the ultimate phishing content within Javascript and running such scripts only on the client; (4) looking beyond typical credentials and credit cards for new content such as IDs and documents; (5) hiding phishing content until after human interaction. We attribute the root cause to the dependency of ML-based models on the vertical feature space (webpage content). These solutions rely only on what phishers present within the page itself. Thus, we propose Anti-SubtlePhish, a more resilient model based on logistic regression. The key augmentation is the inclusion of a horizontal feature space, which examines correlation variables between the final render of suspicious pages against what trusted services have recorded (e.g., PageRank). To defeat (1) and (2), we correlate information between WHOIS, PageRank, and page analytics. To combat (3), (4) and (5), we correlate features after rendering the page. Experiments with 100K phishing/benign sites show promising accuracy (98.8%). We also obtained 100% accuracy against 0-day phishing pages that were manually crafted, comparing well to the 0% recorded by VT vendors over the first four days.

preprint2022arXiv

Unraveling Threat Intelligence Through the Lens of Malicious URL Campaigns

The daily deluge of alerts is a sombre reality for Security Operations Centre (SOC) personnel worldwide. They are at the forefront of an organisation's cybersecurity infrastructure, and face the unenviable task of prioritising threats amongst a flood of abstruse alerts triggered by their Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems. URLs found within malicious communications form the bulk of such alerts, and pinpointing pertinent patterns within them allows teams to rapidly deescalate potential or extant threats. This need for vigilance has been traditionally filled with machine-learning based log analysis tools and anomaly detection concepts. To sidestep machine learning approaches, we instead propose to analyse suspicious URLs from SIEM alerts via the perspective of malicious URL campaigns. By first grouping URLs within 311M records gathered from VirusTotal into 2.6M suspicious clusters, we thereafter discovered 77.8K malicious campaigns. Corroborating our suspicions, we found 9.9M unique URLs attributable to 18.3K multi-URL campaigns, and that worryingly, only 2.97% of campaigns were found by security vendors. We also confer insights on evasive tactics such as ever lengthier URLs and more diverse domain names, with selected case studies exposing other adversarial techniques. By characterising the concerted campaigns driving these URL alerts, we hope to inform SOC teams of current threat trends, and thus arm them with better threat intelligence.