Source author record

Raimund Seidel

Raimund Seidel appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computational Geometry Computational Complexity Data Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Inserting one edge into a simple drawing is hard

A {\em simple drawing} $D(G)$ of a graph $G$ is one where each pair of edges share at most one point: either a common endpoint or a proper crossing. An edge $e$ in the complement of $G$ can be {\em inserted} into $D(G)$ if there exists a simple drawing of $G+e$ extending $D(G)$. As a result of Levi's Enlargement Lemma, if a drawing is rectilinear (pseudolinear), that is, the edges can be extended into an arrangement of lines (pseudolines), then any edge in the complement of $G$ can be inserted. In contrast, we show that it is NP -complete to decide whether one edge can be inserted into a simple drawing. This remains true even if we assume that the drawing is pseudocircular, that is, the edges can be extended to an arrangement of pseudocircles. On the positive side, we show that, given an arrangement of pseudocircles $\mathcal{A}$ and a pseudosegment $σ$, it can be decided in polynomial time whether there exists a pseudocircle $Φ_σ$ extending $σ$ for which $\mathcal{A}\cup\{Φ_σ\}$ is again an arrangement of pseudocircles.

preprint2022arXiv

The Influence of Dimensions on the Complexity of Computing Decision Trees

A decision tree recursively splits a feature space $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ and then assigns class labels based on the resulting partition. Decision trees have been part of the basic machine-learning toolkit for decades. A large body of work treats heuristic algorithms to compute a decision tree from training data, usually aiming to minimize in particular the size of the resulting tree. In contrast, little is known about the complexity of the underlying computational problem of computing a minimum-size tree for the given training data. We study this problem with respect to the number $d$ of dimensions of the feature space. We show that it can be solved in $O(n^{2d + 1}d)$ time, but under reasonable complexity-theoretic assumptions it is not possible to achieve $f(d) \cdot n^{o(d / \log d)}$ running time, where $n$ is the number of training examples. The problem is solvable in $(dR)^{O(dR)} \cdot n^{1+o(1)}$ time, if there are exactly two classes and $R$ is an upper bound on the number of tree leaves labeled with the first~class.

preprint2014arXiv

Counting Triangulations and other Crossing-Free Structures Approximately

We consider the problem of counting straight-edge triangulations of a given set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane. Until very recently it was not known whether the exact number of triangulations of $P$ can be computed asymptotically faster than by enumerating all triangulations. We now know that the number of triangulations of $P$ can be computed in $O^{*}(2^{n})$ time, which is less than the lower bound of $Ω(2.43^{n})$ on the number of triangulations of any point set. In this paper we address the question of whether one can approximately count triangulations in sub-exponential time. We present an algorithm with sub-exponential running time and sub-exponential approximation ratio, that is, denoting by $Λ$ the output of our algorithm, and by $c^{n}$ the exact number of triangulations of $P$, for some positive constant $c$, we prove that $c^{n}\leqΛ\leq c^{n}\cdot 2^{o(n)}$. This is the first algorithm that in sub-exponential time computes a $(1+o(1))$-approximation of the base of the number of triangulations, more precisely, $c\leqΛ^{\frac{1}{n}}\leq(1 + o(1))c$. Our algorithm can be adapted to approximately count other crossing-free structures on $P$, keeping the quality of approximation and running time intact. In this paper we show how to do this for matchings and spanning trees.