BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Fabian Klute

Fabian Klute contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational GeometryData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputational Complexitymath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Balanced Independent and Dominating Sets on Colored Interval Graphs

We study two new versions of independent and dominating set problems on vertex-colored interval graphs, namely $f$-Balanced Independent Set ($f$-BIS) and $f$-Balanced Dominating Set ($f$-BDS). Let $G=(V,E)$ be a vertex-colored interval graph with a color assignment function $γ\colon V \rightarrow \{1,\ldots,k\}$ that maps all vertices in $G$ onto $k$ colors. A subset of vertices $S\subseteq V$ is called $f$-balanced if $S$ contains $f$ vertices from each color class. In the $f$-BIS and $f$-BDS problems, the objective is to compute an independent set or a dominating set that is $f$-balanced. We show that both problems are NP-complete even on proper interval graphs. For the $f$-BIS problem, we design two FPT algorithms, one parameterized by $(f,k)$ for interval graphs and the other parameterized by the vertex cover number for general graphs. Moreover, for an optimization variant of BIS on interval graphs, we show that a simple greedy approach achieves an approximation ratio of $2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Efficient Segment Folding is Hard

We introduce a computational origami problem which we call the segment folding problem: given a set of $n$ line-segments in the plane the aim is to make creases along all segments in the minimum number of folding steps. Note that a folding might alter the relative position between the segments, and a segment could split into two. We show that it is NP-hard to determine whether $n$ line segments can be folded in $n$ simple folding operations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Inserting one edge into a simple drawing is hard

A {\em simple drawing} $D(G)$ of a graph $G$ is one where each pair of edges share at most one point: either a common endpoint or a proper crossing. An edge $e$ in the complement of $G$ can be {\em inserted} into $D(G)$ if there exists a simple drawing of $G+e$ extending $D(G)$. As a result of Levi's Enlargement Lemma, if a drawing is rectilinear (pseudolinear), that is, the edges can be extended into an arrangement of lines (pseudolines), then any edge in the complement of $G$ can be inserted. In contrast, we show that it is NP -complete to decide whether one edge can be inserted into a simple drawing. This remains true even if we assume that the drawing is pseudocircular, that is, the edges can be extended to an arrangement of pseudocircles. On the positive side, we show that, given an arrangement of pseudocircles $\mathcal{A}$ and a pseudosegment $σ$, it can be decided in polynomial time whether there exists a pseudocircle $Φ_σ$ extending $σ$ for which $\mathcal{A}\cup\{Φ_σ\}$ is again an arrangement of pseudocircles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Streaming Algorithms for Geometric Independent Set and Clique

We study the maximum geometric independent set and clique problems in the streaming model. Given a collection of geometric objects arriving in an insertion only stream, the aim is to find a subset such that all objects in the subset are pairwise disjoint or intersect respectively. We show that no constant factor approximation algorithm exists to find a maximum set of independent segments or $2$-intervals without using a linear number of bits. Interestingly, our proof only requires a set of segments whose intersection graph is also an interval graph. This reveals an interesting discrepancy between segments and intervals as there does exist a $2$-approximation for finding an independent set of intervals that uses only $O(α(\mathcal{I})\log |\mathcal{I}|)$ bits of memory for a set of intervals $\mathcal{I}$ with $α(\mathcal{I})$ being the size of the largest independent set of $\mathcal{I}$. On the flipside we show that for the geometric clique problem there is no constant-factor approximation algorithm using less than a linear number of bits even for unit intervals. On the positive side we show that the maximum geometric independent set in a set of axis-aligned unit-height rectangles can be $4$-approximated using only $O(α(\mathcal{R})\log |\mathcal{R}|)$ bits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Local Complexity of Polygons

Many problems in Discrete and Computational Geometry deal with simple polygons or polygonal regions. Many algorithms and data-structures perform considerably faster, if the underlying polygonal region has low local complexity. One obstacle to make this intuition rigorous, is the lack of a formal definition of local complexity. Here, we give two possible definitions and show how they are related in a combinatorial sense. We say that a polygon $P$ has point visibility width $w=pvw$, if there is no point $q\in P$ that sees more than $w$ reflex vertices. We say that a polygon $P$ has chord visibility width $w=cvw $, if there is no chord $c=\textrm{seg}(a,b)\subset P$ that sees more than w reflex vertices. We show that \[ cvw \leq pvw ^{O( pvw )},\] for any simple polygon. Furthermore, we show that there exists a simple polygon with \[ cvw \geq 2^{Ω( pvw )}.\]

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Extending Nearly Complete 1-Planar Drawings in Polynomial Time

The problem of extending partial geometric graph representations such as plane graphs has received considerable attention in recent years. In particular, given a graph $G$, a connected subgraph $H$ of $G$ and a drawing $\mathcal{H}$ of $H$, the extension problem asks whether $\mathcal{H}$ can be extended into a drawing of $G$ while maintaining some desired property of the drawing (e.g., planarity). In their breakthrough result, Angelini et al. [ACM TALG 2015] showed that the extension problem is polynomial-time solvable when the aim is to preserve planarity. Very recently we considered this problem for partial 1-planar drawings [ICALP 2020], which are drawings in the plane that allow each edge to have at most one crossing. The most important question identified and left open in that work is whether the problem can be solved in polynomial time when $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by deleting a bounded number of vertices and edges. In this work, we answer this question positively by providing a constructive polynomial-time decision algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Extending Partial 1-Planar Drawings

Algorithmic extension problems of partial graph representations such as planar graph drawings or geometric intersection representations are of growing interest in topological graph theory and graph drawing. In such an extension problem, we are given a tuple $(G,H,\mathcal{H})$ consisting of a graph $G$, a connected subgraph $H$ of $G$ and a drawing $\mathcal{H}$ of $H$, and the task is to extend $\mathcal{H}$ into a drawing of $G$ while maintaining some desired property of the drawing, such as planarity. In this paper we study the problem of extending partial 1-planar drawings, which are drawings in the plane that allow each edge to have at most one crossing. In addition we consider the subclass of IC-planar drawings, which are 1-planar drawings with independent crossings. Recognizing 1-planar graphs as well as IC-planar graphs is \NP-complete and the \NP-completeness easily carries over to the extension problem. Therefore, our focus lies on establishing the tractability of such extension problems in a weaker sense than polynomial-time tractability. Here, we show that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of edges missing from $H$, i.e., the edge deletion distance between $H$ and $G$. The second part of the paper then turns to a more powerful parameterization which is based on measuring the vertex+edge deletion distance between the partial and complete drawing, i.e., the minimum number of vertices and edges that need to be deleted to obtain $H$ from $G$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Finding large matchings in 1-planar graphs of minimum degree 3

A matching is a set of edges without common endpoint. It was recently shown that every 1-planar graph (i.e., a graph that can be drawn in the plane with at most one crossing per edge) that has minimum degree 3 has a matching of size at least $\frac{n+12}{7}$, and this is tight for some graphs. The proof did not come with an algorithm to find the matching more efficiently than a general-purpose maximum-matching algorithm. In this paper, we give such an algorithm. More generally, we show that any matching that has no augmenting paths of length 9 or less has size at least $\frac{n+12}{7}$ in a 1-planar graph with minimum degree 3.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Four Pages Are Indeed Necessary for Planar Graphs

An embedding of a graph in a book consists of a linear order of its vertices along the spine of the book and of an assignment of its edges to the pages of the book, so that no two edges on the same page cross. The book thickness of a graph is the minimum number of pages over all its book embeddings. Accordingly, the book thickness of a class of graphs is the maximum book thickness over all its members. In this paper, we address a long-standing open problem regarding the exact book thickness of the class of planar graphs, which previously was known to be either three or four. We settle this problem by demonstrating planar graphs that require four pages in any of their book embeddings, thus establishing that the book thickness of the class of planar graphs is four.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access