Source author record

Rafael B. Stern

Rafael B. Stern appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Logical coherence in Bayesian simultaneous three-way hypothesis tests

This paper studies whether Bayesian simultaneous three-way hypothesis tests can be logically coherent. Two types of results are obtained. First, under the standard error-wise constant loss, only for a limited set of models can a Bayes simultaneous test be logically coherent. Second, if more general loss functions are used, then it is possible to obtain Bayes simultaneous tests that are always logically coherent. An explicit example of such a loss function is provided.

preprint2014arXiv

Compensating for the loss of a chance

Civil liability for a lost chance applies to legal cases in which a tortious action changes the probabilities of the outcomes that can be obtained by the victim. A central point in the application of this type of liability is the valuation of damages. Despite the practical importance of the valuation of lost chances, the legal restrictions that guide it have rarely been discussed explicitly. In order to discuss these restrictions, we propose an abstract description of a lost chance case in which there are multiple possible outcomes and the victim can make a choice that affects these outcomes. Given this description, we propose six conceptual questions to guide the valuation of lost chances. We discuss alternative answers to these questions and present the formulas that derive from them. More specifically, we show that the main formulas that have been proposed for medical misdiagnosis cases are particular instances of the alternatives we discuss.