Source author record

R. M. Khakimov

R. M. Khakimov appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Translation-invariant and periodic Gibbs measures for Potts model on a Cayley tree

In this paper is studied ferromagnetic three states Potts model on a Cayley tree of order three and we give explicit formulas for translation-invariant Gibbs measures. Furthermore, we show that under some conditions on the parameter of the antiferromagnetic Potts model with q-states with zero external field on the Cayley tree of order $k>2$, there are exactly 2(2^q-1) periodic (non translation-invariant) Gibbs measures.

preprint2014arXiv

Description of the translation-invariant splitting Gibbs measures for the Potts model on a Cayley tree

For the $q$-state Potts model on a Cayley tree of order $k\geq 2$ it is well-known that at sufficiently low temperatures there are at least $q+1$ translation-invariant Gibbs measures which are also tree-indexed Markov chains. Such measures are called translation-invariant splitting Gibbs measures (TISGMs). In this paper we find all TISGMs, and show in particular that at sufficiently low temperatures their number is $2^{q}-1$. We prove that there are $[q/2]$ (where $[a]$ is the integer part of $a$) critical temperatures at which the number of TISGMs changes and give the exact number of TISGMs for each intermediate temperature. For the binary tree we give explicit formulae for the critical temperatures and the possible TISGMs. While we show that these measures are never convex combinations of each other, the question which of these measures are extremals in the set of all Gibbs measures will be treated in future work.