BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

R. B. Sandeep

R. B. Sandeep contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational Complexitymath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Cutting a tree with Subgraph Complementation is hard, except for some small trees

For a graph property $Π$, Subgraph Complementation to $Π$ is the problem to find whether there is a subset $S$ of vertices of the input graph $G$ such that modifying $G$ by complementing the subgraph induced by $S$ results in a graph satisfying the property $Π$. We prove that the problem of Subgraph Complementation to $T$-free graphs is NP-Complete, for $T$ being a tree, except for 41 trees of at most 13 vertices (a graph is $T$-free if it does not contain any induced copies of $T$). This result, along with the 4 known polynomial-time solvable cases (when $T$ is a path on at most 4 vertices), leaves behind 37 open cases. Further, we prove that these hard problems do not admit any subexponential-time algorithms, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis. As an additional result, we obtain that Subgraph Complementation to paw-free graphs can be solved in polynomial-time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On subgraph complementation to H-free graphs

For a class $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs, the problem SUBGRAPH COMPLEMENT TO $\mathcal{G}$ asks whether one can find a subset $S$ of vertices of the input graph $G$ such that complementing the subgraph induced by $S$ in $G$ results in a graph in $\mathcal{G}$. We investigate the complexity of the problem when $\mathcal{G}$ is $H$-free for $H$ being a complete graph, a star, a path, or a cycle. We obtain the following results: - When $H$ is a $K_t$ (a complete graph on $t$ vertices) for any fixed $t\geq 1$, the problem is solvable in polynomial-time. This applies even when $\mathcal{G}$ is a subclass of $K_t$-free graphs recognizable in polynomial-time, for example, the class of $(t-2)$-degenerate graphs. - When $H$ is a $K_{1,t}$ (a star graph on $t+1$ vertices), we obtain that the problem is NP-complete for every $t\geq 5$. This, along with known results, leaves only two unresolved cases - $K_{1,3}$ and $K_{1,4}$. - When $H$ is a $P_t$ (a path on $t$ vertices), we obtain that the problem is NP-complete for every $t\geq 7$, leaving behind only two unresolved cases - $P_5$ and $P_6$. - When $H$ is a $C_t$ (a cycle on $t$ vertices), we obtain that the problem is NP-complete for every $t\geq 8$, leaving behind four unresolved cases - $C_4, C_5, C_6,$ and $C_7$. Further, we prove that these hard problems do not admit subexponential-time algorithms (algorithms running in time $2^{o(|V(G)|)}$), assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis. A simple complementation argument implies that results for $\mathcal{G}$ are applicable for $\overline{\mathcal{G}}$, thereby obtaining similar results for $H$ being the complement of a complete graph, a star, a path, or a cycle. Our results generalize two main results and resolve one open question by Fomin et al. (Algorithmica, 2020).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Polynomial Kernelization of $\mathcal{H}$-free Edge Deletion

For a set of graphs $\mathcal{H}$, the \textsc{$\mathcal{H}$-free Edge Deletion} problem asks to find whether there exist at most $k$ edges in the input graph whose deletion results in a graph without any induced copy of $H\in\mathcal{H}$. In \cite{cai1996fixed}, it is shown that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable if $\mathcal{H}$ is of finite cardinality. However, it is proved in \cite{cai2013incompressibility} that if $\mathcal{H}$ is a singleton set containing $H$, for a large class of $H$, there exists no polynomial kernel unless $coNP\subseteq NP/poly$. In this paper, we present a polynomial kernel for this problem for any fixed finite set $\mathcal{H}$ of connected graphs and when the input graphs are of bounded degree. We note that there are \textsc{$\mathcal{H}$-free Edge Deletion} problems which remain NP-complete even for the bounded degree input graphs, for example \textsc{Triangle-free Edge Deletion}\cite{brugmann2009generating} and \textsc{Custer Edge Deletion($P_3$-free Edge Deletion)}\cite{komusiewicz2011alternative}. When $\mathcal{H}$ contains $K_{1,s}$, we obtain a stronger result - a polynomial kernel for $K_t$-free input graphs (for any fixed $t> 2$). We note that for $s>9$, there is an incompressibility result for \textsc{$K_{1,s}$-free Edge Deletion} for general graphs \cite{cai2012polynomial}. Our result provides first polynomial kernels for \textsc{Claw-free Edge Deletion} and \textsc{Line Edge Deletion} for $K_t$-free input graphs which are NP-complete even for $K_4$-free graphs\cite{yannakakis1981edge} and were raised as open problems in \cite{cai2013incompressibility,open2013worker}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The chromatic discrepancy of graphs

For a proper vertex coloring $c$ of a graph $G$, let $φ_c(G)$ denote the maximum, over all induced subgraphs $H$ of $G$, the difference between the chromatic number $χ(H)$ and the number of colors used by $c$ to color $H$. We define the chromatic discrepancy of a graph $G$, denoted by $φ(G)$, to be the minimum $φ_c(G)$, over all proper colorings $c$ of $G$. If $H$ is restricted to only connected induced subgraphs, we denote the corresponding parameter by $\hatφ(G)$. These parameters are aimed at studying graph colorings that use as few colors as possible in a graph and all its induced subgraphs. We study the parameters $φ(G)$ and $\hatφ(G)$ and obtain bounds on them. We obtain general bounds, as well as bounds for certain special classes of graphs including random graphs. We provide structural characterizations of graphs with $φ(G) = 0$ and graphs with $\hatφ(G) = 0$. We also show that computing these parameters is NP-hard.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access