Source author record

Dhanyamol Antony

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Cutting a tree with Subgraph Complementation is hard, except for some small trees

For a graph property ΠΠ, Subgraph Complementation to ΠΠ is the problem to find whether there is a subset SS of vertices of the input graph GG such that modifying GG by complementing the subgraph induced by SS results in a graph satisfying the property ΠΠ. We prove that the problem of Subgraph Complementation to TT-free graphs is NP-Complete, for TT being a tree, except for 41 trees of at most 13 vertices (a graph is TT-free if it does not contain any induced copies of TT). This result, along with the 4 known polynomial-time solvable cases (when TT is a path on at most 4 vertices), leaves behind 37 open cases. Further, we prove that these hard problems do not admit any subexponential-time algorithms, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis. As an additional result, we obtain that Subgraph Complementation to paw-free graphs can be solved in polynomial-time.

preprint2021arXiv

On subgraph complementation to H-free graphs

For a class G\mathcal{G} of graphs, the problem SUBGRAPH COMPLEMENT TO G\mathcal{G} asks whether one can find a subset SS of vertices of the input graph GG such that complementing the subgraph induced by SS in GG results in a graph in G\mathcal{G}. We investigate the complexity of the problem when G\mathcal{G} is HH-free for HH being a complete graph, a star, a path, or a cycle. We obtain the following results: - When HH is a KtK_t (a complete graph on tt vertices) for any fixed t≥1t\geq 1, the problem is solvable in polynomial-time. This applies even when G\mathcal{G} is a subclass of KtK_t-free graphs recognizable in polynomial-time, for example, the class of (t−2)(t-2)-degenerate graphs. - When HH is a K1,tK_{1,t} (a star graph on t+1t+1 vertices), we obtain that the problem is NP-complete for every t≥5t\geq 5. This, along with known results, leaves only two unresolved cases - K1,3K_{1,3} and K1,4K_{1,4}. - When HH is a PtP_t (a path on tt vertices), we obtain that the problem is NP-complete for every t≥7t\geq 7, leaving behind only two unresolved cases - P5P_5 and P6P_6. - When HH is a CtC_t (a cycle on tt vertices), we obtain that the problem is NP-complete for every t≥8t\geq 8, leaving behind four unresolved cases - C4,C5,C6,C_4, C_5, C_6, and C7C_7. Further, we prove that these hard problems do not admit subexponential-time algorithms (algorithms running in time 2o(∣V(G)∣)2^{o(|V(G)|)}), assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis. A simple complementation argument implies that results for G\mathcal{G} are applicable for G‾\overline{\mathcal{G}}, thereby obtaining similar results for HH being the complement of a complete graph, a star, a path, or a cycle. Our results generalize two main results and resolve one open question by Fomin et al. (Algorithmica, 2020).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.