BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Qiao Kang

Qiao Kang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingCryptography and Securityhep-exphysics.comp-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Data Storage for HEP Experiments in the Era of High-Performance Computing

As particle physics experiments push their limits on both the energy and the intensity frontiers, the amount and complexity of the produced data are also expected to increase accordingly. With such large data volumes, next-generation efforts like the HL-LHC and DUNE will rely even more on both high-throughput (HTC) and high-performance (HPC) computing clusters. Full utilization of HPC resources requires scalable and efficient data-handling and I/O. For the last few decades, ROOT has been used by most HEP experiments to store data. However, other storage technologies like HDF5 may perform better in HPC environments. Initial explorations with HDF5 have begun using ATLAS, CMS and DUNE data; the DUNE experiment has also adopted HDF5 for its data-acquisition system. This paper presents the future outlook of the HEP computing and the role of HPC, and a summary of ongoing and future works to use HDF5 as a possible data storage technology for the HEP experiments to use in HPC environments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Defense Strategies Toward Model Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning: A Survey

Advances in distributed machine learning can empower future communications and networking. The emergence of federated learning (FL) has provided an efficient framework for distributed machine learning, which, however, still faces many security challenges. Among them, model poisoning attacks have a significant impact on the security and performance of FL. Given that there have been many studies focusing on defending against model poisoning attacks, it is necessary to survey the existing work and provide insights to inspire future research. In this paper, we first classify defense mechanisms for model poisoning attacks into two categories: evaluation methods for local model updates and aggregation methods for the global model. Then, we analyze some of the existing defense strategies in detail. We also discuss some potential challenges and future research directions. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to survey defense methods for model poisoning attacks in FL.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Improving MPI Collective I/O Performance With Intra-node Request Aggregation

Two-phase I/O is a well-known strategy for implementing collective MPI-IO functions. It redistributes I/O requests among the calling processes into a form that minimizes the file access costs. As modern parallel computers continue to grow into the exascale era, the communication cost of such request redistribution can quickly overwhelm collective I/O performance. This effect has been observed from parallel jobs that run on multiple compute nodes with a high count of MPI processes on each node. To reduce the communication cost, we present a new design for collective I/O by adding an extra communication layer that performs request aggregation among processes within the same compute nodes. This approach can significantly reduce inter-node communication congestion when redistributing the I/O requests. We evaluate the performance and compare with the original two-phase I/O on a Cray XC40 parallel computer with Intel KNL processors. Using I/O patterns from two large-scale production applications and an I/O benchmark, we show the performance improvement of up to 29 times when running 16384 MPI processes on 256 compute nodes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access