Researcher profile

Priyanka Raina

Priyanka Raina contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Hardware Abstractions and Hardware Mechanisms to Support Multi-Task Execution on Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Arrays

Domain-specific accelerators are used in various computing systems ranging from edge devices to data centers. Coarse-grained reconfigurable arrays (CGRAs) represent an architectural midpoint between the flexibility of an FPGA and the efficiency of an ASIC and are a promising candidate for servicing multi-tasked workloads within an application domain. Unfortunately, scheduling multiple tasks onto a CGRA is challenging. CGRAs lack abstractions that capture hardware resources, leaving workload schedulers unable to reason about performance, energy, and utilization for different schedules. This work first proposes a CGRA architecture that can flexibly partition key resources, including the global buffer memory capacity, the global buffer memory bandwidth, and the compute resources. Partitioned resources serve as hardware abstractions that decouple compilation and resource allocation. The compiler uses these abstractions for coarse-grained resource mapping, and the scheduler uses them for flexible resource allocation at run time. We then propose two hardware mechanisms to support multi-task execution. A flexible-shape execution region increases the overall resource utilization by mapping multiple tasks with different resource requirements. Dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR) enables a CGRA to update the hardware configuration as the scheduler makes decisions rapidly. We show that our abstraction can help automatic and efficient scheduling of multi-tasked workloads onto our target CGRA with high utilization, resulting in 1.05x-1.24x higher throughput and a 23-28% lower latency in a multi-tasked cloud workload and 60.8% reduced latency in an autonomous system workload when compared to a baseline CGRA running single tasks at a time.

preprint2020arXiv

Interstellar: Using Halide's Scheduling Language to Analyze DNN Accelerators

We show that DNN accelerator micro-architectures and their program mappings represent specific choices of loop order and hardware parallelism for computing the seven nested loops of DNNs, which enables us to create a formal taxonomy of all existing dense DNN accelerators. Surprisingly, the loop transformations needed to create these hardware variants can be precisely and concisely represented by Halide's scheduling language. By modifying the Halide compiler to generate hardware, we create a system that can fairly compare these prior accelerators. As long as proper loop blocking schemes are used, and the hardware can support mapping replicated loops, many different hardware dataflows yield similar energy efficiency with good performance. This is because the loop blocking can ensure that most data references stay on-chip with good locality and the processing units have high resource utilization. How resources are allocated, especially in the memory system, has a large impact on energy and performance. By optimizing hardware resource allocation while keeping throughput constant, we achieve up to 4.2X energy improvement for Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), 1.6X and 1.8X improvement for Long Short-Term Memories (LSTMs) and multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs), respectively.