Source author record

Pradeepkumar Mani

Pradeepkumar Mani appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Distributed Load Management Algorithms in Anycast-based CDNs

Anycast is an internet addressing protocol where multiple hosts share the same IP-address. A popular architecture for modern Content Distribution Networks (CDNs) for geo-replicated services consists of multiple layers of proxy nodes for service and co-located DNS-servers for load-balancing among different proxies. Both the proxies and the DNS-servers use anycast addressing, which offers simplicity of design and high availability of service at the cost of partial loss of routing control. Due to the very nature of anycast, redirection actions by a DNS-server also affects loads at nearby proxies in the network. This makes the problem of optimal distributed load management highly challenging. In this paper, we propose and evaluate an analytical framework to formulate and solve the load-management problem in this context. We consider two distinct algorithms. In the first half of the paper, we pose the load-management problem as a convex optimization problem. Following a Kelly-type dual decomposition technique, we propose a fully-distributed load-management algorithm by introducing FastControl packets. This algorithm utilizes the underlying anycast mechanism itself to enable effective coordination among the nodes, thus obviating the need for any external control channel. In the second half of the paper, we consider an alternative greedy load-management heuristic, currently in production in a major commercial CDN. We study its dynamical characteristics and analytically identify its operational and stability properties. Finally, we critically evaluate both the algorithms and explore their optimality-vs-complexity trade-off using trace-driven simulations.

preprint2015arXiv

Distributed Load Management in Anycast-based CDNs

Anycast is an internet addressing protocol where multiple hosts share the same IP-address. A popular architecture for modern Content Distribution Networks (CDNs) for geo-replicated HTTP-services consists of multiple layers of proxy nodes for service and co-located DNS-servers for load-balancing on different proxies. Both the proxies and the DNS-servers use anycast addressing, which offers simplicity of design and high availability of service at the cost of partial loss of routing control. Due to the very nature of anycast, load-management decisions by a co-located DNS-server also affects loads at nearby proxies in the network. This makes the problem of distributed load management highly challenging. In this paper, we propose an analytical framework to formulate and solve the load-management problem in this context. We consider two distinct algorithms. In the first half of the paper, we pose the load-management problem as a convex optimization problem. Following a dual decomposition technique, we propose a fully-distributed load management algorithm by introducing FastControl packets. This algorithm utilizes the underlying anycast mechanism itself to enable effective coordination among the nodes, thus obviating the need for any external control channel. In the second half of the paper, we consider an alternative greedy load-management heuristic, currently in production in a major commercial CDN. We study its dynamical characteristics and analytically identify its operational and stability properties. Finally, we critically evaluate both the algorithms and explore their optimality-vs-complexity trade-off using trace-driven simulations.