Researcher profile

Plinio Moreno

Plinio Moreno contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Active Gaze Control for Foveal Scene Exploration

Active perception and foveal vision are the foundations of the human visual system. While foveal vision reduces the amount of information to process during a gaze fixation, active perception will change the gaze direction to the most promising parts of the visual field. We propose a methodology to emulate how humans and robots with foveal cameras would explore a scene, identifying the objects present in their surroundings with in least number of gaze shifts. Our approach is based on three key methods. First, we take an off-the-shelf deep object detector, pre-trained on a large dataset of regular images, and calibrate the classification outputs to the case of foveated images. Second, a body-centered semantic map, encoding the objects classifications and corresponding uncertainties, is sequentially updated with the calibrated detections, considering several data fusion techniques. Third, the next best gaze fixation point is determined based on information-theoretic metrics that aim at minimizing the overall expected uncertainty of the semantic map. When compared to the random selection of next gaze shifts, the proposed method achieves an increase in detection F1-score of 2-3 percentage points for the same number of gaze shifts and reduces to one third the number of required gaze shifts to attain similar performance.

preprint2020arXiv

Action Anticipation for Collaborative Environments: The Impact of Contextual Information and Uncertainty-Based Prediction

To interact with humans in collaborative environments, machines need to be able to predict (i.e., anticipate) future events, and execute actions in a timely manner. However, the observation of the human limb movements may not be sufficient to anticipate their actions unambiguously. In this work, we consider two additional sources of information (i.e., context) over time, gaze, movement and object information, and study how these additional contextual cues improve the action anticipation performance. We address action anticipation as a classification task, where the model takes the available information as the input and predicts the most likely action. We propose to use the uncertainty about each prediction as an online decision-making criterion for action anticipation. Uncertainty is modeled as a stochastic process applied to a time-based neural network architecture, which improves the conventional class-likelihood (i.e., deterministic) criterion. The main contributions of this paper are four-fold: (i) We propose a novel and effective decision-making criterion that can be used to anticipate actions even in situations of high ambiguity; (ii) we propose a deep architecture that outperforms previous results in the action anticipation task when using the Acticipate collaborative dataset; (iii) we show that contextual information is important to disambiguate the interpretation of similar actions; and (iv) we also provide a formal description of three existing performance metrics that can be easily used to evaluate action anticipation models.Our results on the Acticipate dataset showed the importance of contextual information and the uncertainty criterion for action anticipation. We achieve an average accuracy of 98.75% in the anticipation task using only an average of 25% of observations.