Source author record

Piotr J. Górski

Piotr J. Górski appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Homophily based on few attributes can impede structural balance

Two complementary mechanisms are thought to shape social groups: homophily between agents and structural balance in connected triads. Here we consider $N$ fully connected agents, where each agent has $G$ underlying attributes, and the similarity between agents in attribute space (i.e., homophily) is used to determine the link weight between them. To incorporate structural balance we use a triad-updating rule where only one attribute of one agent is changed intentionally in each update, but this also leads to accidental changes in link weights and even link polarities. The link weight dynamics in the limit of large $G$ is described by a Fokker-Planck equation from which the conditions for a phase transition to a fully balanced state with all links positive can be obtained. This "paradise state" of global cooperation is, however, difficult to achieve requiring $G > O(N^2)$ and $p>0.5$, where the parameter $p$ captures a willingness to consensus. Allowing edge weights to be a consequence of attributes naturally captures homophily and reveals that many real-world social systems would have a subcritical number of attributes necessary to achieve structural balance.

preprint2020arXiv

Why understanding multiplex social network structuring processes will help us better understand the evolution of human behavior

Social scientists have long appreciated that relationships between individuals cannot be described from observing a single domain, and that the structure across domains of interaction can have important effects on outcomes of interest (e.g., cooperation).1 One debate explicitly about this surrounds food sharing. Some argue that failing to find reciprocal food sharing means that some process other than reciprocity must be occurring, whereas others argue for models that allow reciprocity to span domains in the form of trade.2 Multilayer networks, high-dimensional networks that allow us to consider multiple sets of relationships at the same time, are ubiquitous and have consequences, so processes giving rise to them are important social phenomena. The analysis of multi-dimensional social networks has recently garnered the attention of the network science community.3 Recent models of these processes show how ignoring layer interdependencies can lead one to miss why a layer formed the way it did, and/or draw erroneous conclusions.6 Understanding the structuring processes that underlie multiplex networks will help understand increasingly rich datasets, giving more accurate and complete pictures of social interactions.