Researcher profile

Pierre Thibault

Pierre Thibault contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

cond-mat.mes-hall eess.IV physics.class-ph physics.comp-ph physics.data-an physics.flu-dyn physics.med-ph physics.optics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - Baseline

4works

0followers

8topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

High-speed processing of X-ray wavefront marking data with the Unified Modulated Pattern Analysis (UMPA) model

Wavefront-marking X-ray imaging techniques use e.g., sandpaper or a grating to generate intensity fluctuations, and analyze their distortion by the sample in order to retrieve attenuation, phase-contrast, and dark-field information. Phase contrast yields an improved visibility of soft-tissue specimens, while dark-field reveals small-angle scatter from sub-resolution structures. Both have found many biomedical and engineering applications. The previously developed Unified Modulated Pattern Analysis (UMPA) model extracts these modalities from wavefront-marking data. We here present a new UMPA implementation, capable of rapidly processing large datasets and featuring capabilities to greatly extend the field of view. We also discuss possible artifacts and additional new features.

preprint2016arXiv

High-Resolution Hard X-ray Holography by Unconfined Atomic Layer Deposited Phase-Shifting 3D References

We demonstrate high-resolution non-iterative holographic coherent diffraction imaging with hard X-rays using a novel phase-shifting reference, fabricated by atomic layer deposition to produce nanosharp 3D structure. The method surpasses the limitations associated with absorbing substrates predominantly employed in soft X-ray holography using extended, customized and point-source references. The unconfined experimental setup relaxes the technical constraints, allows effective data correction, and enables independent sample translation and rotation for data averaging and tomography. Applicable to single-shot measurements, phase and amplitude reconstructions of samples are retrieved with single-pixel resolution and differential contrast by simple non-iterative computation.

preprint2012arXiv

Fast acoustic tweezers for the two-dimensional manipulation of individual particles in microfluidic channels

This paper presents a microfluidic device that implements standing surface acoustic waves in order to handle single cells, droplets, and generally particles. The particles are moved in a very controlled manner by the two-dimensional drifting of a standing wave array, using a slight frequency modulation of two ultrasound emitters around their resonance. These acoustic tweezers allow any type of motion at velocities up to few 10mm/s, while the device transparency is adapted for optical studies. The possibility of automation provides a critical step in the development of lab-on-a-chip cell sorters and it should find applications in biology, chemistry, and engineering domains.

preprint2010arXiv

Feasibility of 3D reconstructions from a single 2D diffraction measurement

We comment on the recent manuscript by Raines et al. [arXiv:0905.0269v2] (now published in Nature, vol. 463, p. 214-217, 2010), which suggests that in certain conditions a single diffraction measurement may be sufficient to reconstruct the full three-dimensional density of a scatterer. We show that past literature contains the tools to assess rigorously the feasibility of this approach. We question the formulation of the reconstruction algorithm used by the authors and we argue that the experimental data used as a demonstration is not suitable for this method, and thus that the reconstruction is not valid. This second version was produced for documentation purposes. In addition to the minimally modified original comment, it includes in appendix a subsequent reply to one of the authors (J. Miao).